linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Torsten Duwe <torsten@lst.de>
To: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	jeyu@redhat.com, jkosina@suse.cz, jikos@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org, mbenes@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] ppc64 livepatch: frameless klp_return_helper using odd TOC
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 09:04:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160324080449.GA13139@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56F34F85.7020408@gmail.com>

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 01:23:01PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> On 24/03/16 02:58, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> >
> > 1. Heuristics are bad. The better they are, the more subtly the
> >    way they might fail.
[...]
> I missed this yesterday, not on cc, but caught it on the list today

I replied to Michael's last post and removed the back reference to start
a new thread. The list is rather long... sorry I didn't notice.

> Thanks for working on this. I did a quick look, so the CR+4 code

Yes. It's only a proof of concept. That idea is yours, no doubt, and
should be mentioned in the final submission. I already wrote it in my
previous version, where I also have changed the arithmetic to produce
small positive deltas.

> plus heuristics for global/local call detection?

Nope, definitely not! I flag global entries unambiguously.
I had a version with R12/LR heuristics on Monday which I dumped.

>  I'll review this soon - hopefully tonight, but we have a long weekend coming up, so there might be delays. In the meanwhile feel free to add my signed-off-by for the CR+4 code. I am also looking at a different approach -- per thread lr0 stack.

This CR+4 code leaves only 1 slot, so sibling calls are extremely dangerous,
as I mentioned. But with a little attention, this patch works very well.

I mostly wanted to hear opinions about a transient odd TOC value
before I start polishing.

	Torsten

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-24  8:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-23 15:58 [PATCH/RFC] ppc64 livepatch: frameless klp_return_helper using odd TOC Torsten Duwe
2016-03-24  2:23 ` Balbir Singh
2016-03-24  8:04   ` Torsten Duwe [this message]
2016-03-24 11:06     ` Michael Ellerman
2016-03-24 10:14 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2016-03-24 10:27   ` Torsten Duwe
2016-03-24 15:58     ` Kamalesh Babulal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160324080449.GA13139@lst.de \
    --to=torsten@lst.de \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeyu@redhat.com \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).