From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] samples/bpf: Simplify building BPF samples
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 00:21:39 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160331185139.GD17907@naverao1-tp.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56FD632B.4040306@fb.com>
On 2016/03/31 10:49AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 3/31/16 4:25 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> >Make BPF samples build depend on CONFIG_SAMPLE_BPF. We still don't add a
> >Kconfig option since that will add a dependency on llvm for allyesconfig
> >builds which may not be desirable.
> >
> >Those who need to build the BPF samples can now just do:
> >
> >make CONFIG_SAMPLE_BPF=y
> >
> >or:
> >
> >export CONFIG_SAMPLE_BPF=y
> >make
>
> I don't like this 'simplification'.
> make samples/bpf/
> is much easier to type than capital letters.
This started out as a patch to have the BPF samples built with a Kconfig
option. As stated in the commit description, I realised that it won't
work for allyesconfig builds. However, the reason I retained this patch
is since it gets us one step closer to building the samples as part of
the kernel build.
The 'simplification' is since I can now have the export in my .bashrc
and the kernel build will now build the BPF samples too without
requiring an additional 'make samples/bpf/' step.
I agree this is subjective, so I am ok if this isn't taken in.
- Naveen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-31 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-31 11:25 [PATCH 1/4] samples/bpf: Fix build breakage with map_perf_test_user.c Naveen N. Rao
2016-03-31 11:25 ` [PATCH 2/4] samples/bpf: Use llc in PATH, rather than a hardcoded value Naveen N. Rao
2016-03-31 17:46 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-03-31 18:19 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-04-01 14:37 ` Naveen N. Rao
2016-04-01 17:56 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-03-31 11:25 ` [PATCH 3/4] samples/bpf: Simplify building BPF samples Naveen N. Rao
2016-03-31 17:49 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-03-31 18:51 ` Naveen N. Rao [this message]
2016-03-31 19:20 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-03-31 11:25 ` [PATCH 4/4] samples/bpf: Enable powerpc support Naveen N. Rao
2016-03-31 17:52 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-04-01 14:41 ` Naveen N. Rao
2016-04-01 17:58 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-03-31 17:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] samples/bpf: Fix build breakage with map_perf_test_user.c Alexei Starovoitov
2016-03-31 18:46 ` Naveen N. Rao
2016-03-31 19:19 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160331185139.GD17907@naverao1-tp.ibm.com \
--to=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ast@fb.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).