From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, tlfalcon@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ibmvnic: Defer tx completion processing using a wait queue
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 21:12:02 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160412.211202.1299929008077475122.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <570D61E7.2090203@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: John Allen <jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:00:23 -0500
> On 04/12/2016 03:12 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Tue, 2016-04-12 at 14:38 -0500, John Allen wrote:
>>> Moves tx completion processing out of interrupt context, deferring work
>>> using a wait queue. With this work now deferred, we must account for the
>>> possibility that skbs can be sent faster than we can process completion
>>> requests in which case the tx buffer will overflow. If the tx buffer is
>>> full, ibmvnic_xmit will return NETDEV_TX_BUSY and stop the current tx
>>> queue. Subsequently, the queue will be restarted in ibmvnic_complete_tx
>>> when all pending tx completion requests have been cleared.
>>
>> 1) Why is this needed ?
>
> In the current ibmvnic implementation, tx completion processing is done in
> interrupt context. Depending on the load, this can block further
> interrupts for a long time. This patch just creates a bottom half so that
> when a tx completion interrupt comes in, we can defer the majority of the
> work and exit interrupt context quickly.
You should use NAPI polling for this, not your own invented
mechanism.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-13 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-12 19:38 [PATCH net-next] ibmvnic: Defer tx completion processing using a wait queue John Allen
2016-04-12 20:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-04-12 21:00 ` John Allen
2016-04-13 1:12 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160412.211202.1299929008077475122.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tlfalcon@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).