From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Anju T <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jolsa@redhat.com, dsahern@gmail.com,
acme@redhat.com, sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
hemant@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 2/4] perf/powerpc: add support for sampling intr machine state
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:45:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160421111531.GD28637@naverao1-tp.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455944568-7231-3-git-send-email-anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 2016/02/20 10:32AM, Anju T wrote:
> The perf infrastructure uses a bit mask to find out valid
> registers to display. Define a register mask for supported
> registers defined in asm/perf_regs.h. The bit positions also
> correspond to register IDs which is used by perf infrastructure
> to fetch the register values. CONFIG_HAVE_PERF_REGS enables
> sampling of the interrupted machine state.
Please also update
Documentation/features/perf/perf-regs/arch-support.txt as part of this
patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anju T <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 93 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> index 9a7057e..c4ce60d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ config PPC
> select GENERIC_ATOMIC64 if PPC32
> select ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
> select HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
> + select HAVE_PERF_REGS
> select HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API
> select HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT if PERF_EVENTS && PPC_BOOK3S_64
> select ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile
> index f9c083a..2f2d3d2 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ obj64-$(CONFIG_PPC_PERF_CTRS) += power4-pmu.o ppc970-pmu.o power5-pmu.o \
> power8-pmu.o
> obj32-$(CONFIG_PPC_PERF_CTRS) += mpc7450-pmu.o
>
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS) += perf_regs.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_EMB_PERF_EVENT) += core-fsl-emb.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_EMB_PERF_EVENT_E500) += e500-pmu.o e6500-pmu.o
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..ae0759c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
You may want to add a copyright header here.
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/sched.h>
> +#include <linux/perf_event.h>
> +#include <linux/bug.h>
> +#include <linux/stddef.h>
> +#include <asm/ptrace.h>
> +#include <asm/perf_regs.h>
> +
> +#define PT_REGS_OFFSET(id, r) [id] = offsetof(struct pt_regs, r)
Also, run this through checkpatch.pl. There is a whitespace issue
reported here.
> +
> +#define REG_RESERVED (~((1ULL << PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX) - 1))
> +
> +static unsigned int pt_regs_offset[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX] = {
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0, gpr[0]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R1, gpr[1]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R2, gpr[2]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R3, gpr[3]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R4, gpr[4]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R5, gpr[5]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R6, gpr[6]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R7, gpr[7]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R8, gpr[8]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R9, gpr[9]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R10, gpr[10]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R11, gpr[11]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R12, gpr[12]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R13, gpr[13]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R14, gpr[14]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R15, gpr[15]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R16, gpr[16]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R17, gpr[17]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R18, gpr[18]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R19, gpr[19]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R20, gpr[20]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R21, gpr[21]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R22, gpr[22]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R23, gpr[23]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R24, gpr[24]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R25, gpr[25]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R26, gpr[26]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R27, gpr[27]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R28, gpr[28]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R29, gpr[29]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R30, gpr[30]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R31, gpr[31]),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_NIP, nip),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_MSR, msr),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_ORIG_R3, orig_gpr3),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_CTR, ctr),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_LNK, link),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_XER, xer),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_CCR, ccr),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_SOFTE, softe),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_TRAP, trap),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_DAR, dar),
> + PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR, dsisr),
> +};
> +
> +u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
> +{
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX))
> + return 0;
> +
> + return regs_get_register(regs, pt_regs_offset[idx]);
> +}
> +
> +int perf_reg_validate(u64 mask)
> +{
> + if (!mask || mask & REG_RESERVED)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> +#ifdef __powerpc64__
> + if (!test_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_32BIT))
> + return PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64;
> + else
The 'else' above is redundant.
- Naveen
> +#endif
> + return PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_32;
> +}
> +
> +void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
> + struct pt_regs *regs,
> + struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
> +{
> + regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
> + regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
> +}
> --
> 2.1.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-21 11:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-20 5:02 [PATCH V11 0/4]perf/powerpc: Add ability to sample intr machine state in powerpc Anju T
2016-02-20 5:02 ` [PATCH V11 1/4] perf/powerpc: assign an id to each powerpc register Anju T
2016-04-21 11:07 ` Naveen N. Rao
2016-04-21 13:39 ` [V11,1/4] " Michael Ellerman
2016-02-20 5:02 ` [PATCH V11 2/4] perf/powerpc: add support for sampling intr machine state Anju T
2016-04-21 11:15 ` Naveen N. Rao [this message]
2016-04-21 13:39 ` [V11, " Michael Ellerman
2016-02-20 5:02 ` [PATCH V11 3/4] tools/perf: Map the ID values with register names Anju T
2016-04-21 13:39 ` [V11,3/4] " Michael Ellerman
2016-02-20 5:02 ` [PATCH V2 4/4] tool/perf: Add sample_reg_mask to include all perf_regs Anju T
2016-04-21 13:39 ` [V2,4/4] " Michael Ellerman
2016-03-07 8:23 ` [PATCH V11 0/4]perf/powerpc: Add ability to sample intr machine state in powerpc Anju T
2016-04-18 9:47 ` Anju T
2016-04-20 3:57 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-20 4:55 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-04-20 13:16 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-21 13:41 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160421111531.GD28637@naverao1-tp.ibm.com \
--to=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=hemant@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).