From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e23smtp05.au.ibm.com (e23smtp05.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3qrx5m3XJGzDqZn for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 23:18:52 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost by e23smtp05.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 23:18:51 +1000 Received: from d23relay08.au.ibm.com (d23relay08.au.ibm.com [9.185.71.33]) by d23dlp01.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD4C2CE8057 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 23:18:41 +1000 (EST) Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (d23av04.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.139]) by d23relay08.au.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u3MDIXrX21233800 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 23:18:41 +1000 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u3MDI8TL016843 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 23:18:08 +1000 Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 23:17:45 +1000 From: Gavin Shan To: Russell Currey Cc: Gavin Shan , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, alistair@popple.id.au, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, mpe@ellerman.id.au Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/eeh: Drop unnecessary label in eeh_pe_change_owner() Message-ID: <20160422131745.GB31375@gwshan> Reply-To: Gavin Shan References: <1461239595-5627-1-git-send-email-gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1461239595-5627-3-git-send-email-gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1461307125.2646.5.camel@russell.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 In-Reply-To: <1461307125.2646.5.camel@russell.cc> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 04:38:45PM +1000, Russell Currey wrote: >On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 21:53 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote: >> The label "reset" in eeh_pe_change_owner() is used only for once. >> No need to keep it and just drop it. No logicial changes introduced. > >"logicial" should be "logical". =A0I found something to be pedantic abou= t on each >patch! :) Thanks, Russell. I'll fix in next revision ;-) >>=20 >> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan >> --- > >Reviewed-by: Russell Currey >