From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3rCtRj4VGZzDqF5 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 19:25:05 +1000 (AEST) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:4978:20e::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3rCtRj17dnz9sBm for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 19:25:05 +1000 (AEST) Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 11:24:51 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Lorenzo Pieralisi Cc: Steve Muckle , Daniel Lezcano , Shilpasri G Bhat , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Gautham R. Shenoy" , shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com, akshay.adiga@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Increase in idle power with schedutil Message-ID: <20160523092451.GF15728@worktop.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1463576020-18597-1-git-send-email-shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160519114029.GW3193@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <201605201223.u4KCNWn9028105@mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com> <20160522103912.GN3193@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20160522204252.GH15383@graphite.smuckle.net> <20160523090004.GA21186@red-moon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20160523090004.GA21186@red-moon> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:00:04AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > It is also related to static leakage power that depends on the operating > voltage (ie higher operating frequencies require higher voltage) so in a > way scaling frequency before going idle may not be effective if voltage > does not scale too in turn. Sure, but the platform drivers 'know' all this and can make the right decision.