From: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] kexec_file_load implementation for PowerPC
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 15:02:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160613070258.GA4974@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465701022-11601-1-git-send-email-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 06/12/16 at 12:10am, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch series implements the kexec_file_load system call on PowerPC.
>
> It starts by removing an x86 assumption from kexec_file: kexec_add_buffer uses
> iomem to find reserved memory ranges, but PowerPC uses the memblock subsystem.
> Hooks are added so that each arch can specify how memory ranges can be found.
>
> Also, the memory-walking logic in kexec_add_buffer is useful in this
> implementation to find a free area for the purgatory's stack, so that same
> patch moves that logic to kexec_locate_mem_hole.
>
> The kexec_file_load system call needs to apply relocations to the purgatory
> but adding code for that would duplicate functionality with the module loading
> mechanism, which also needs to apply relocations to the kernel modules.
> Therefore, this patch series factors out the module relocation code so that it
> can be shared.
>
> One thing that is still missing is crashkernel support, which I intend to
> submit shortly.
But seems there's no error handling in patches about KEXEC_ON_CRASH?
It would be good to either sending out the whole set or handle the error
cases correctly.
[snip]
Thanks
Dave
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-13 7:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-12 3:10 [PATCH 0/8] kexec_file_load implementation for PowerPC Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-12 3:10 ` [PATCH 1/8] kexec_file: Remove unused members from struct kexec_buf Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-13 7:05 ` Dave Young
2016-06-12 3:10 ` [PATCH 2/8] kexec_file: Generalize kexec_add_buffer Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-13 7:12 ` Dave Young
2016-06-13 7:29 ` Dave Young
2016-06-13 19:08 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-13 20:40 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-14 1:22 ` Dave Young
2016-06-12 3:10 ` [PATCH 3/8] powerpc: Factor out relocation code from module_64.c to elf_util_64.c Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-12 3:10 ` [PATCH 4/8] powerpc: Generalize elf64_apply_relocate_add Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-12 3:10 ` [PATCH 5/8] powerpc: Add functions to read ELF files of any endianness Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-12 3:10 ` [PATCH 6/8] powerpc: Implement kexec_file_load Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-12 3:10 ` [PATCH 7/8] powerpc: Add support for loading ELF kernels with kexec_file_load Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-12 3:10 ` [PATCH 8/8] powerpc: Add purgatory for kexec_file_load implementation Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-13 7:02 ` Dave Young [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160613070258.GA4974@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com \
--to=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).