linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
	Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2] powerpc/pseries: start rtasd before PCI probing
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:02:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160621110201.38d8711c@bahia.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <146602104462.23192.4267928292361711364.stgit@bahia.lan>

On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 22:26:41 +0200
Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> A strange behaviour is observed when comparing PCI hotplug in QEMU, between
> x86 and pseries. If you consider the following steps:
> - start a VM
> - add a PCI device via the QEMU monitor before the rtasd has started (for
>   example starting the VM in paused state, or hotplug during FW or boot
>   loader)
> - resume the VM execution
> 
> The x86 kernel detects the PCI device, but the pseries one does not.
> 
> This happens because the rtasd kernel worker is currently started under
> device_initcall, while PCI probing happens earlier under subsys_initcall.
> 
> As a consequence, if we have a pending RTAS event at boot time, a message
> is printed and the event is dropped.
> 
> This patch moves all the initialization of rtasd to arch_initcall, which is
> run before subsys_call: this way, logging_enabled is true when the RTAS
> event pops up and it is not lost anymore.
> 
> The proc fs bits stay at device_initcall because they cannot be run before
> fs_initcall.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> v2: - avoid behaviour change: don't create the proc entry if early init failed
> 

I forgot to mention that Thomas had sent a Tested-by for v1, which I think is
still valid for v2.

> Michael,
> 
> This was also tested under PowerVM: it doesn't fix anything there because the
> HMC tells it won't honor DLPAR features as long as the RMC isn't here, which
> happens later in the boot sequence. It hence seems impossible to have a pending
> RTAS event at boot time.
> 
> It doesn't seem to break anything either, the kernel boots and hotplug works
> okay once the RMC is up.
> 
> Cheers.
> 
> --
> Greg
> 
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/rtasd.c |   22 +++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtasd.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtasd.c
> index e864b7c5884e..a26a02006576 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtasd.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtasd.c
> @@ -526,10 +526,8 @@ void rtas_cancel_event_scan(void)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rtas_cancel_event_scan);
>  
> -static int __init rtas_init(void)
> +static int __init rtas_event_scan_init(void)
>  {
> -	struct proc_dir_entry *entry;
> -
>  	if (!machine_is(pseries) && !machine_is(chrp))
>  		return 0;
>  
> @@ -562,13 +560,27 @@ static int __init rtas_init(void)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> +	start_event_scan();
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +arch_initcall(rtas_event_scan_init);
> +
> +static int __init rtas_init(void)
> +{
> +	struct proc_dir_entry *entry;
> +
> +	if (!machine_is(pseries) && !machine_is(chrp))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (!rtas_log_buf)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>  	entry = proc_create("powerpc/rtas/error_log", S_IRUSR, NULL,
>  			    &proc_rtas_log_operations);
>  	if (!entry)
>  		printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to create error_log proc entry\n");
>  
> -	start_event_scan();
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  __initcall(rtas_init);
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-21 13:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-15 20:26 [PATCH v2] powerpc/pseries: start rtasd before PCI probing Greg Kurz
2016-06-21  9:02 ` Greg Kurz [this message]
2016-07-07 17:26   ` [Qemu-ppc] " Greg Kurz
2016-07-08  9:25     ` Michael Ellerman
2016-07-11 10:19 ` [v2] " Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160621110201.38d8711c@bahia.lan \
    --to=groug@kaod.org \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).