From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-x236.google.com (mail-pa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3rz67m5Cg8zDqfp for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 15:27:16 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pa0-x236.google.com with SMTP id ks6so68502079pab.0 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 22:27:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 15:27:06 +1000 From: Nicholas Piggin To: Madhavan Srinivasan Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, anton@samba.org, paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/9] Add #defs for paca->soft_enabled flags Message-ID: <20160726152706.43bffd08@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1469458342-26233-2-git-send-email-maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1469458342-26233-1-git-send-email-maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1469458342-26233-2-git-send-email-maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 20:22:14 +0530 Madhavan Srinivasan wrote: > Two #defs LAZY_INTERRUPT_ENABLED and > LAZY_INTERRUPT_DISABLED are added to be used > when updating paca->soft_enabled. This is a very nice patchset, but can this not be a new name? We use "soft enabled/disabled" everywhere for it. I think lazy is an implementation detail anyway because some interrupts don't cause a hard disable at all. Thanks, Nick