linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, anton@samba.org,
	paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 8/9] powerpc: Support to replay PMIs
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 15:50:58 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160726155058.13651136@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1469458342-26233-9-git-send-email-maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 20:22:21 +0530
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> Code to replay the Performance Monitoring Interrupts(PMI).
> In the masked_interrupt handler, for PMIs we reset the MSR[EE]
> and return. This is due the fact that PMIs are level triggered.
> In the __check_irq_replay(), we enabled the MSR[EE] which will
> fire the interrupt for us.
> 
> Patch also adds a new arch_local_irq_disable_var() variant. New
> variant takes an input value to write to the paca->soft_enabled.
> This will be used in following patch to implement the tri-state
> value for soft-enabled.

Same comment also applies about patches being standalone
transformations that work before and after. Some of these
can be squashed together I think.


> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c         |  9 ++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h index cc69dde6eb84..863179654452
> 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> @@ -81,6 +81,20 @@ static inline unsigned long
> arch_local_irq_disable(void) return flags;
>  }
>  
> +static inline unsigned long arch_local_irq_disable_var(int value)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags, zero;
> +
> +	asm volatile(
> +		"li %1,%3; lbz %0,%2(13); stb %1,%2(13)"
> +		: "=r" (flags), "=&r" (zero)
> +		: "i" (offsetof(struct paca_struct, soft_enabled)),\
> +		  "i" (value)
> +		: "memory");
> +
> +	return flags;
> +}

arch_ function suggests it is arch implementation of a generic
kernel function or something. I think our soft interrupt levels
are just used in powerpc specific code.

The name could also be a little more descriptive.

I would have our internal function be something like

soft_irq_set_level(), and then the arch disable just sets to
the appropriate level as it does today.

The PMU disable level could be implemented in powerpc specific
header with local_irq_and_pmu_disable() or something like that.

Thanks,
Nick

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-26  5:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-25 14:52 [RFC PATCH 0/9]powerpc: "paca->soft_enabled" based local atomic operation implementation Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-07-25 14:52 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] Add #defs for paca->soft_enabled flags Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-07-26  5:27   ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-07-26  6:05     ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-07-26  6:13       ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-07-28 13:54       ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-07-25 14:52 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] Cleanup to use LAZY_INTERRUPT_* macros for paca->soft_enabled update Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-07-25 14:52 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] powerpc: move set_soft_enabled() Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-07-25 14:52 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] powerpc: Use set_soft_enabled api to update paca->soft_enabled Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-07-25 14:52 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] powerpc: reverse the soft_enable logic Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-07-26  5:31   ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-07-26  6:07     ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-07-25 14:52 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] powerpc: modify __SOFTEN_TEST to support tri-state soft_enabled flag Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-07-26  5:41   ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-07-26  6:12     ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-07-25 14:52 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] powerpc: Add support to mask perf interrupts Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-07-26  5:46   ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-07-26  6:25     ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-07-26  6:30       ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-07-26  6:46         ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-07-26  7:10           ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-07-26  7:22             ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-07-26  7:34               ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-07-25 14:52 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] powerpc: Support to replay PMIs Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-07-26  5:50   ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2016-07-26  6:40     ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-07-25 14:52 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] powerpc: rewrite local_t using soft_irq Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-07-26  5:53   ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-07-26  6:41     ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-07-26 12:21 ` [RFC PATCH 0/9]powerpc: "paca->soft_enabled" based local atomic operation implementation Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-07-26 13:42   ` Madhavan Srinivasan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160726155058.13651136@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).