From: Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon@gmail.com>
To: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppc64: allow ptrace to set TM bits
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 13:43:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160802054351.GA16975@simonLocalRHEL7.x64> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1469785882-9892-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hi Laurent,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:51:22AM +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> static int set_user_msr(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long msr)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM
> + if (!(task->thread.regs->msr & MSR_TM)) {
> + /* If TM is not available, discard TM bits changes */
> + msr &= ~(MSR_TM | MSR_TS_MASK);
> + }
> +#endif
I am not sure whether following is an issue:
Per PowerISA, any exception/interrupt will disable MSR[TM] bit
automatically and mark MSR_TS to be suspended when it is
transactional. It is possible that MSR[TM] = 0 and MSR[MSR_TS] != 0
(suspended).
Will set_user_msr() be able to escape from the above?
For example, one user space application encountered
page fault during transaction, its task->thread.regs->msr & MSR_TM == 0
and MSR[MSR_TS] == suspended. Then it is being traced and
set_user_msr() is invoked on it. I think it will be incorrect to
clear its MSR_TS_MASK bits.....
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Thanks,
- Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-02 5:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-29 9:51 [PATCH] ppc64: allow ptrace to set TM bits Laurent Dufour
2016-08-02 5:43 ` Simon Guo [this message]
2016-08-17 14:40 ` Laurent Dufour
2016-08-22 1:01 ` Cyril Bur
2016-08-22 9:53 ` Laurent Dufour
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160802054351.GA16975@simonLocalRHEL7.x64 \
--to=wei.guo.simon@gmail.com \
--cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).