From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3sHlQ12qkhzDrJq for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:22:17 +1000 (AEST) Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:22:00 +0800 From: Dave Young To: Thiago Jung Bauermann Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Balbir Singh , Paul Mackerras , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-ima-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Stewart Smith , Baoquan He , Michael Ellerman , x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Mimi Zohar , Vivek Goyal , Petko Manolov , Thomas Gleixner , Eric Richter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, David Laight , Eric Biederman , Andrew Morton , Samuel Mendoza-Jonas , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] powerpc: kexec_file: Add buffer hand-over support for the next kernel Message-ID: <20160822072200.GA32673@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> References: <1471058305-30198-1-git-send-email-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1471058305-30198-3-git-send-email-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160822032135.GB30489@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <5233171.lLzbU6ABRT@hactar> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <5233171.lLzbU6ABRT@hactar> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 08/22/16 at 12:38am, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > Am Montag, 22 August 2016, 11:21:35 schrieb Dave Young: > > On 08/13/16 at 12:18am, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c > > > b/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c index > > > a484a6346146..190c652e49b7 100644 > > > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c > > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c > > > @@ -490,6 +490,60 @@ int arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(struct > > > kimage *image)> > > > return image->fops->cleanup(image->image_loader_data); > > > > > > } > > > > > > +bool kexec_can_hand_over_buffer(void) > > > +{ > > > + return true; > > > +} > > > + > > > +int arch_kexec_add_handover_buffer(struct kimage *image, > > > + unsigned long load_addr, unsigned long > size) > > > +{ > > > + image->arch.handover_buffer_addr = load_addr; > > > + image->arch.handover_buffer_size = size; > > > + > > > + return 0; > > > +} > > > + > > > +int kexec_get_handover_buffer(void **addr, unsigned long *size) > > > +{ > > > + int ret; > > > + u64 start_addr, end_addr; > > > + > > > + ret = of_property_read_u64(of_chosen, > > > + "linux,kexec-handover-buffer-start", > > > + &start_addr); > > > + if (ret == -EINVAL) > > > + return -ENOENT; > > > + else if (ret) > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > + > > > + ret = of_property_read_u64(of_chosen, > > > "linux,kexec-handover-buffer-end", + > &end_addr); > > > + if (ret == -EINVAL) > > > + return -ENOENT; > > > + else if (ret) > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > + > > > + *addr = __va(start_addr); > > > + /* -end is the first address after the buffer. */ > > > + *size = end_addr - start_addr; > > > + > > > + return 0; > > > +} > > > > This depends on dtb, so if IMA want to extend it to arches like x86 in > > the future you will have to think about other way to pass it. > > > > How about think about a general way now? > > The only general way I can think of is by adding a kernel command line > parameter which the first kernel would pass to the second kernel, but IMHO > that is ugly, because such parameter wouldn't be useful to a user, and it > would also be something that, from the perspective of the user, would > magically appear in the kernel command line of the second kernel... Sorry I just brought up the question, actually I have no idea either. Maybe we have to do this with arch specific ways.. Thanks Dave