From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-x241.google.com (mail-wm0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3sYr9N1NlwzDsW3 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:45:11 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-wm0-x241.google.com with SMTP id b184so797640wma.3 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 22:45:11 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Ingo Molnar Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:45:03 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Michael Ellerman Cc: Jiri Olsa , Andi Kleen , Sukadev Bhattiprolu , mingo@redhat.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , peterz@infradead.org, maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 00/20] perf, tools: Add support for PMU events in JSON format Message-ID: <20160914054503.GA31616@gmail.com> References: <1466481770-25290-1-git-send-email-sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160831114254.GA9001@krava> <20160831144247.GV3078@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <20160831145459.GA32396@krava> <20160831161530.GW3078@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <20160901064613.GA17731@krava> <871t0np7qj.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <871t0np7qj.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , * Michael Ellerman wrote: > Jiri Olsa writes: > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 09:15:30AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > I've already made some changes in pmu-events/* to support > >> > > > this hierarchy to see how bad the change would be.. and > >> > > > it's not that bad ;-) > >> > > > >> > > Everything has to be automated, please no manual changes. > >> > > >> > sure > >> > > >> > so, if you're ok with the layout, how do you want to proceed further? > >> > >> If the split version is acceptable it's fine for me to merge it. > >> > >> I'll add split-json to my scripting, so the next update would > >> be split too. > > > > ook, I'll wait for patches then > > Who are you waiting for patches from? > > Would be great if this could go in for 4.9 still. No objections from me - the latest bits were good: Acked-by: Ingo Molnar Thanks, Ingo