linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, anton@samba.org,
	paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] powerpc: rewrite local_t using soft_irq
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 21:01:20 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160916210120.395a52be@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1473944523-624-14-git-send-email-maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 18:32:03 +0530
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> Local atomic operations are fast and highly reentrant per CPU counters.
> Used for percpu variable updates. Local atomic operations only guarantee
> variable modification atomicity wrt the CPU which owns the data and
> these needs to be executed in a preemption safe way.
> 
> Here is the design of this patch. Since local_* operations
> are only need to be atomic to interrupts (IIUC), we have two options.
> Either replay the "op" if interrupted or replay the interrupt after
> the "op". Initial patchset posted was based on implementing local_* operation
> based on CR5 which replay's the "op". Patchset had issues in case of
> rewinding the address pointor from an array. This make the slow patch
> really slow. Since CR5 based implementation proposed using __ex_table to find
> the rewind addressr, this rasied concerns about size of __ex_table and vmlinux.
> 
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2014-December/123115.html
> 
> But this patch uses, local_irq_pmu_save to soft_disable
> interrupts (including PMIs). After finishing the "op", local_irq_pmu_restore()
> called and correspondingly interrupts are replayed if any occured.
> 
> patch re-write the current local_* functions to use arch_local_irq_disbale.
> Base flow for each function is
> 
> {
> 	local_irq_pmu_save(flags)
> 	load
> 	..
> 	store
> 	local_irq_pmu_restore(flags)
> }
> 
> Reason for the approach is that, currently l[w/d]arx/st[w/d]cx.
> instruction pair is used for local_* operations, which are heavy
> on cycle count and they dont support a local variant. So to
> see whether the new implementation helps, used a modified
> version of Rusty's benchmark code on local_t.
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/16/450
> 
> Modifications to Rusty's benchmark code:
> - Executed only local_t test
> 
> Here are the values with the patch.
> 
> Time in ns per iteration
> 
> Local_t             Without Patch           With Patch
> 
> _inc                        28              8
> _add                        28              8
> _read                       3               3
> _add_return         28              7
> 
> Currently only asm/local.h has been rewrite, and also
> the entire change is tested only in PPC64 (pseries guest)
> and PPC64 host (LE)
> 
> TODO:
> 	- local_cmpxchg and local_xchg needs modification.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/local.h | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/local.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/local.h
> index b8da91363864..fb5728abb4e9 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/local.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/local.h
> @@ -3,6 +3,9 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/percpu.h>
>  #include <linux/atomic.h>
> +#include <linux/irqflags.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/hw_irq.h>
>  
>  typedef struct
>  {
> @@ -14,24 +17,50 @@ typedef struct
>  #define local_read(l)	atomic_long_read(&(l)->a)
>  #define local_set(l,i)	atomic_long_set(&(l)->a, (i))
>  
> -#define local_add(i,l)	atomic_long_add((i),(&(l)->a))
> -#define local_sub(i,l)	atomic_long_sub((i),(&(l)->a))
> -#define local_inc(l)	atomic_long_inc(&(l)->a)
> -#define local_dec(l)	atomic_long_dec(&(l)->a)
> +static __inline__ void local_add(long i, local_t *l)
> +{
> +	long t;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	local_irq_pmu_save(flags);
> +	__asm__ __volatile__(
> +	PPC_LL" %0,0(%2)\n\
> +	add     %0,%1,%0\n"
> +	PPC_STL" %0,0(%2)\n"
> +	: "=&r" (t)
> +	: "r" (i), "r" (&(l->a.counter)));
> +	local_irq_pmu_restore(flags);
> +}
> +
> +static __inline__ void local_sub(long i, local_t *l)
> +{
> +	long t;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	local_irq_pmu_save(flags);
> +	__asm__ __volatile__(
> +	PPC_LL" %0,0(%2)\n\
> +	subf    %0,%1,%0\n"
> +	PPC_STL" %0,0(%2)\n"
> +	: "=&r" (t)
> +	: "r" (i), "r" (&(l->a.counter)));
> +	local_irq_pmu_restore(flags);
> +}
>  
>  static __inline__ long local_add_return(long a, local_t *l)
>  {
>  	long t;
> +	unsigned long flags;
>  
> +	local_irq_pmu_save(flags);
>  	__asm__ __volatile__(
> -"1:"	PPC_LLARX(%0,0,%2,0) "			# local_add_return\n\
> +	PPC_LL" %0,0(%2)\n\
>  	add	%0,%1,%0\n"
> -	PPC405_ERR77(0,%2)
> -	PPC_STLCX	"%0,0,%2 \n\
> -	bne-	1b"
> +	PPC_STL	"%0,0(%2)\n"
>  	: "=&r" (t)
>  	: "r" (a), "r" (&(l->a.counter))
>  	: "cc", "memory");
> +	local_irq_pmu_restore(flags);

Are all your clobbers correct? You might not be clobbering "cc" here
anymore, for example. Could you double check those? Otherwise, awesome
patch!

Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-09-16 11:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-15 13:01 [PATCH 00/13] powerpc: "paca->soft_enabled" based local atomic operation implementation Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-09-15 13:01 ` [PATCH 01/13] powerpc: Add #defs for paca->soft_enabled flags Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-09-15 13:01 ` [PATCH 02/13] powerpc: Cleanup to use IRQ_DISABLE_MASK_* macros for paca->soft_enabled update Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-09-16  9:47   ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-09-19  4:04     ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-09-15 13:01 ` [PATCH 03/13] powerpc: move set_soft_enabled() and rename Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-09-16  9:50   ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-09-19  4:05     ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-09-15 13:01 ` [PATCH 04/13] powerpc: Use soft_enabled_set api to update paca->soft_enabled Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-09-16  9:53   ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-09-16 11:43     ` David Laight
2016-09-16 11:59       ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-09-16 13:22         ` David Laight
2016-09-19  2:52           ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-09-19  5:32             ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-09-19  5:05       ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-09-19  4:11     ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-09-15 13:01 ` [PATCH 05/13] powerpc: Add soft_enabled manipulation functions Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-09-16  9:57   ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-09-19  5:41     ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-09-15 13:01 ` [PATCH 06/13] powerpc: reverse the soft_enable logic Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-09-16 10:05   ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-09-19  5:45     ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-09-15 13:01 ` [PATCH 07/13] powerpc: Avoid using EXCEPTION_PROLOG_1 macro in MASKABLE_* Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-09-16 10:08   ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-09-15 13:01 ` [PATCH 08/13] powerpc: Add new _EXCEPTION_PROLOG_1 macro Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-09-16 10:12   ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-09-19  5:54     ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-09-15 13:01 ` [PATCH 09/13] powerpc: Introduce new mask bit for soft_enabled Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-09-16 10:16   ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-09-19  5:57     ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-09-15 13:02 ` [PATCH 10/13] powerpc: Add "bitmask" paramater to MASKABLE_* macros Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-09-16 11:03   ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-09-19  5:58     ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-09-15 13:02 ` [PATCH 11/13] powerpc: Add support to mask perf interrupts and replay them Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-09-16 10:47   ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-09-15 13:02 ` [PATCH 12/13] powerpc: Add a Kconfig and a functions to set new soft_enabled mask Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-09-16 10:34   ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-09-16 10:56   ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-09-19  6:03     ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-09-15 13:02 ` [PATCH 13/13] powerpc: rewrite local_t using soft_irq Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-09-15 16:55   ` kbuild test robot
2016-09-16 11:01   ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2016-09-16 11:08 ` [PATCH 00/13] powerpc: "paca->soft_enabled" based local atomic operation implementation Nicholas Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160916210120.395a52be@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).