From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vk0-x22e.google.com (mail-vk0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3spHjc3PvLzDrFn for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 23:07:46 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-vk0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 192so187464863vkl.2 for ; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 05:07:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 09:07:37 -0300 From: Marcelo Cerri To: Michael Ellerman Cc: Herbert Xu , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , George Wilson , Claudio Carvalho , Paulo Flabiano Smorigo , joy.latten@canonical.com, "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: sha1-powerpc: little-endian support Message-ID: <20161004120737.GA16223@gallifrey> References: <1474659116-4689-1-git-send-email-marcelo.cerri@canonical.com> <20160928131551.GA31082@gallifrey> <20160928132015.GA21312@gondor.apana.org.au> <20160928132718.GB31082@gallifrey> <87pong4oq3.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL" In-Reply-To: <87pong4oq3.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Michael, On Ubuntu, CRYPTO_MANAGER_DISABLE_TESTS is set by default. So I had to disable this config in order to make sha1-powerpc fail in the crypto API tests. However, even with tests disabled, any usage of sha1-powerpc should result in incorrect results. --=20 Regards, Marcelo On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 05:23:16PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Marcelo Cerri writes: >=20 > > [ Unknown signature status ] > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 09:20:15PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:15:51AM -0300, Marcelo Cerri wrote: > >> > Hi Herbert, > >> >=20 > >> > Any thoughts on this one? > >>=20 > >> Can this patch wait until the next merge window? On the broken > >> platforms it should just fail the self-test, right? > > > > Yes. It fails on any LE platform (including Ubuntu and RHEL 7.1). >=20 > How are you testing this? I thought I was running the crypto tests but > I've never seen this fail. >=20 > cheers --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAABCAAGBQJX85uIAAoJEM8aS8c01e1HPcEH/1tDwYlq2+4dg+EF4M384b0B Q5pPKS74g/5abaoCpxgBflHVvg6nr4XgWgrRIECHqiMBKJWN7rUZ7XigtPnNtq4a vKAVUP6lYDem1cB1i1p9g1maAAyOYn5LCfETfIqqM3n9qL5Valje8krc8buxVI7R q0XGMRBSmmqTyk7gW/VDfoZy5TMlfflKYq1E1bPBEEIhMEQFuQS6b9cniThryh0l WMOKv/mNctP5a9trB/BGceluuhtcoeTBhdFhDEyHNOPvsGsdOL7IDSlGRZcQAxaS pw8dM465K2JA1y8ZdWqsTSb4UHuhZ+gO/BBNwg+nJjWo5MjXSni3PO0mUM1hzXw= =Gkyv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL--