From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
Received: from NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
 (mail-cys01nam02on0082.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.37.82])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3t3GCb6jpTzDvkd
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 01:45:15 +1100 (AEDT)
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 07:44:59 -0700
From: =?utf-8?B?U8O2cmVu?= Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CC: Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com>, Marc Zyngier
 <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, <monstr@monstr.eu>, <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
 <jason@lakedaemon.net>, <alistair@popple.id.au>,
 <mporter@kernel.crashing.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
 <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
 <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>, <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, <paulus@samba.org>,
 <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v5 04/12] irqchip: xilinx: Add support for parent intc
Message-ID: <20161025144459.GF14444@xsjsorenbubuntu>
References: <1476723176-39891-1-git-send-email-Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com>
 <1476723176-39891-5-git-send-email-Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com>
 <32f5f17d-7864-c782-7a6f-03660b7ab055@arm.com>
 <581adf44-388c-f8e5-8437-59d7ace2fa8f@imgtec.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610251246020.4990@nanos>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610251246020.4990@nanos>
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 12:49:33 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016, Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel wrote:
> > On 10/21/2016 10:48 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > Shouldn't you return an error if irq is zero?
> > > 
> > 
> > I'll add the following for the error case
> > 
> > 	pr_err("%s: Parent exists but interrupts property not defined\n" ,
> > __func__);
> 
> Please do not use this silly __func__ stuff. It's not giving any value to
> the printout.
> 
> Set a proper prefix for your pr_* stuff, so the string is prefixed with
> 'irq-xilinx:' or whatever you think is appropriate. Then the string itself
> is good enough to find from which place this printk comes.

Haven't looked at the real code, but is there probably a way to get a
struct device pointer and use dev_err?

	Sören