From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH kernel v4 4/4] powerpc/mm/iommu, vfio/spapr: Put pages on VFIO container shutdown
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 14:33:12 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161108033312.GI28688@umbus.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161103010228.GD4764@fergus.ozlabs.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2019 bytes --]
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 12:02:28PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 01:44:03PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> > On 31/10/16 15:23, David Gibson wrote:
> [...]
> > >
> > > Um.. yeah.. that's not really ok. Prohibiting overlapping
> > > registrations on the same container is reasonable enough. Having a
> > > container not be able to register memory because some completely
> > > different container has registered something overlapping is getting
> > > very ugly.
> >
> > I am lost here. Does this mean the patches cannot go upstream?
> >
> > Also how would I implement overlapping if we are not teaching KVM about
> > VFIO containers? The mm list has a counter of how many times each memory
> > region was mapped via TCE (and this prevents unregistration), and if we
> > want overlapping regions - a "mapped" counter of which one would I update
> > in real mode (where I only have a user address and a LIOBN)?
>
> The patches fix a real bug, where we run out of memory to run VMs.
>
> The patches don't change the interface, and don't introduce the
> constraint that is being discussed here (that the regions being
> registered may not overlap unless they are identical to a previously
> registered region). That constraint is already present in the
> upstream code.
Ah, good point. I hadn't thought that through and realized that
limitation was already through.
> They do change the behaviour when you use a container fd from a
> different process from the one which opened the fd, but that is not
> something that worked in any meaningful way before anyway.
>
> So David, do you still see any reason why the patches should not be
> accepted?
Given the (still hideously ugly) limitation is not new, then no, not
any more. I'll send an R-b.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-08 3:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-24 6:53 [PATCH kernel v4 0/4] powerpc/spapr/vfio: Put pages on VFIO container shutdown Alexey Kardashevskiy
2016-10-24 6:53 ` [PATCH kernel v4 1/4] powerpc/iommu: Pass mm_struct to init/cleanup helpers Alexey Kardashevskiy
2016-10-24 6:53 ` [PATCH kernel v4 2/4] powerpc/iommu: Stop using @current in mm_iommu_xxx Alexey Kardashevskiy
2016-10-24 6:53 ` [PATCH kernel v4 3/4] vfio/spapr: Reference mm in tce_container Alexey Kardashevskiy
2016-10-24 7:14 ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-11-08 3:33 ` David Gibson
2016-11-08 22:25 ` Alex Williamson
2016-11-09 0:46 ` David Gibson
2016-10-24 6:53 ` [PATCH kernel v4 4/4] powerpc/mm/iommu, vfio/spapr: Put pages on VFIO container shutdown Alexey Kardashevskiy
2016-10-25 4:44 ` David Gibson
2016-10-25 4:55 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2016-10-31 3:13 ` David Gibson
2016-10-31 4:13 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2016-10-31 4:23 ` David Gibson
2016-11-02 2:44 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2016-11-03 1:02 ` Paul Mackerras
2016-11-08 3:33 ` David Gibson [this message]
2016-11-08 3:35 ` David Gibson
2016-11-08 7:54 ` [PATCH kernel v4 0/4] powerpc/spapr/vfio: " Michael Ellerman
2016-11-08 23:06 ` Alex Williamson
2016-11-10 1:37 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161108033312.GI28688@umbus.fritz.box \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).