linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] powerpc/smp: add set_cpus_related()
Date: Thu,  2 Mar 2017 11:49:17 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170302004920.21948-2-oohall@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170302004920.21948-1-oohall@gmail.com>

Add a helper function for updating the per-cpu core and sibling thread
cpumasks. This helper just sets (or clears) the relevant bit in the
cpumasks each CPU. This is open-coded in several places inside the
mask setup code so moving it into a seperate function is a sensible
cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
index dfe0e1d9cd06..1c531887ca51 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
@@ -377,6 +377,25 @@ static void smp_store_cpu_info(int id)
 #endif
 }
 
+/*
+ * Relationships between CPUs are maintained in a set of per-cpu cpumasks. We
+ * need to ensure that they are kept consistant between CPUs when they are
+ * changed.
+ *
+ * This is slightly tricky since the core mask must be a strict superset of
+ * the sibling mask.
+ */
+static void set_cpus_related(int i, int j, bool related, struct cpumask *(*relation_fn)(int))
+{
+	if (related) {
+		cpumask_set_cpu(i, relation_fn(j));
+		cpumask_set_cpu(j, relation_fn(i));
+	} else {
+		cpumask_clear_cpu(i, relation_fn(j));
+		cpumask_clear_cpu(j, relation_fn(i));
+	}
+}
+
 void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
 {
 	unsigned int cpu;
@@ -616,17 +635,9 @@ static void traverse_siblings_chip_id(int cpu, bool add, int chipid)
 	const struct cpumask *mask = add ? cpu_online_mask : cpu_present_mask;
 	int i;
 
-	for_each_cpu(i, mask) {
-		if (cpu_to_chip_id(i) == chipid) {
-			if (add) {
-				cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_core_mask(i));
-				cpumask_set_cpu(i, cpu_core_mask(cpu));
-			} else {
-				cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cpu_core_mask(i));
-				cpumask_clear_cpu(i, cpu_core_mask(cpu));
-			}
-		}
-	}
+	for_each_cpu(i, mask)
+		if (cpu_to_chip_id(i) == chipid)
+			set_cpus_related(cpu, i, add, cpu_core_mask);
 }
 
 /* Must be called when no change can occur to cpu_present_mask,
@@ -666,23 +677,17 @@ static void traverse_core_siblings(int cpu, bool add)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	/* if the chip-id fails then threads which share L2 cache are */
-
+	/* if the chip-id fails then group siblings by the L2 cache */
 	l2_cache = cpu_to_l2cache(cpu);
 	mask = add ? cpu_online_mask : cpu_present_mask;
 	for_each_cpu(i, mask) {
 		np = cpu_to_l2cache(i);
 		if (!np)
 			continue;
-		if (np == l2_cache) {
-			if (add) {
-				cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_core_mask(i));
-				cpumask_set_cpu(i, cpu_core_mask(cpu));
-			} else {
-				cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cpu_core_mask(i));
-				cpumask_clear_cpu(i, cpu_core_mask(cpu));
-			}
-		}
+
+		if (np == l2_cache)
+			set_cpus_related(cpu, i, add, cpu_core_mask);
+
 		of_node_put(np);
 	}
 	of_node_put(l2_cache);
@@ -720,15 +725,13 @@ void start_secondary(void *unused)
 	for (i = 0; i < threads_per_core; i++) {
 		if (cpu_is_offline(base + i) && (cpu != base + i))
 			continue;
-		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_sibling_mask(base + i));
-		cpumask_set_cpu(base + i, cpu_sibling_mask(cpu));
+		set_cpus_related(cpu, base + i, true, cpu_sibling_mask);
 
 		/* cpu_core_map should be a superset of
 		 * cpu_sibling_map even if we don't have cache
 		 * information, so update the former here, too.
 		 */
-		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_core_mask(base + i));
-		cpumask_set_cpu(base + i, cpu_core_mask(cpu));
+		set_cpus_related(cpu, base + i, true, cpu_core_mask);
 	}
 	traverse_core_siblings(cpu, true);
 
@@ -818,10 +821,8 @@ int __cpu_disable(void)
 	/* Update sibling maps */
 	base = cpu_first_thread_sibling(cpu);
 	for (i = 0; i < threads_per_core && base + i < nr_cpu_ids; i++) {
-		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cpu_sibling_mask(base + i));
-		cpumask_clear_cpu(base + i, cpu_sibling_mask(cpu));
-		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cpu_core_mask(base + i));
-		cpumask_clear_cpu(base + i, cpu_core_mask(cpu));
+		set_cpus_related(cpu, base + i, false, cpu_sibling_mask);
+		set_cpus_related(cpu, base + i, false, cpu_core_mask);
 	}
 	traverse_core_siblings(cpu, false);
 
-- 
2.9.3

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-02  0:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-02  0:49 [PATCH 1/5] powerpc/smp: use cpu_to_chip_id() to find siblings Oliver O'Halloran
2017-03-02  0:49 ` Oliver O'Halloran [this message]
2017-03-15 11:18   ` [PATCH 2/5] powerpc/smp: add set_cpus_related() Michael Ellerman
2017-03-23  1:27     ` Oliver O'Halloran
2017-03-28  1:15       ` Michael Ellerman
2017-03-02  0:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] powerpc/smp: Add update_cpu_masks() Oliver O'Halloran
2017-03-15 11:18   ` Michael Ellerman
2017-03-02  0:49 ` [PATCH 4/5] powerpc/smp: add cpu_cache_mask Oliver O'Halloran
2017-03-15 11:26   ` Michael Ellerman
2017-03-23  3:33     ` Oliver O'Halloran
2017-03-28  1:05       ` Michael Ellerman
2017-03-02  0:49 ` [PATCH 5/5] powerpc/smp: Add Power9 scheduler topology Oliver O'Halloran
2017-03-02 10:25   ` Balbir Singh
2017-03-15 11:33     ` Michael Ellerman
2017-03-15 11:30   ` Michael Ellerman
2017-03-02  3:44 ` [PATCH 1/5] powerpc/smp: use cpu_to_chip_id() to find siblings Balbir Singh
2017-03-15 11:18 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-03-23  1:09   ` Oliver O'Halloran
2017-03-28  3:03     ` Michael Ellerman
2017-03-28  3:23       ` Oliver O'Halloran

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170302004920.21948-2-oohall@gmail.com \
    --to=oohall@gmail.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).