linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] kernfs: Check KERNFS_HAS_RELEASE before calling kernfs_release_file()
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 08:17:00 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170314024700.6167-1-vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)

Recently started seeing a kernel oops when a module tries removing a
memory mapped sysfs bin_attribute. On closer investigation the root
cause seems to be kernfs_release_file() trying to call
kernfs_op.release() callback that's NULL for such sysfs
bin_attributes. The oops occurs when kernfs_release_file() is called from
kernfs_drain_open_files() to cleanup any open handles with active
memory mappings.

The patch fixes this by checking for flag KERNFS_HAS_RELEASE before
calling kernfs_release_file() in function kernfs_drain_open_files().

On ppc64-le arch with cxl module the oops back-trace is of the
form below:
[  861.381126] Unable to handle kernel paging request for instruction fetch
[  861.381360] Faulting instruction address: 0x00000000
[  861.381428] Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
....
[  861.382481] NIP: 0000000000000000 LR: c000000000362c60 CTR:
0000000000000000
....
Call Trace:
[c000000f1680b750] [c000000000362c34] kernfs_drain_open_files+0x104/0x1d0 (unreliable)
[c000000f1680b790] [c00000000035fa00] __kernfs_remove+0x260/0x2c0
[c000000f1680b820] [c000000000360da0] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x60/0xe0
[c000000f1680b8b0] [c0000000003638f4] sysfs_remove_bin_file+0x24/0x40
[c000000f1680b8d0] [c00000000062a164] device_remove_bin_file+0x24/0x40
[c000000f1680b8f0] [d000000009b7b22c] cxl_sysfs_afu_remove+0x144/0x170 [cxl]
[c000000f1680b940] [d000000009b7c7e4] cxl_remove+0x6c/0x1a0 [cxl]
[c000000f1680b990] [c00000000052f694] pci_device_remove+0x64/0x110
[c000000f1680b9d0] [c0000000006321d4] device_release_driver_internal+0x1f4/0x2b0
[c000000f1680ba20] [c000000000525cb0] pci_stop_bus_device+0xa0/0xd0
[c000000f1680ba60] [c000000000525e80] pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device+0x20/0x40
[c000000f1680ba90] [c00000000004a6c4] pci_hp_remove_devices+0x84/0xc0
[c000000f1680bad0] [c00000000004a688] pci_hp_remove_devices+0x48/0xc0
[c000000f1680bb10] [c0000000009dfda4] eeh_reset_device+0xb0/0x290
[c000000f1680bbb0] [c000000000032b4c] eeh_handle_normal_event+0x47c/0x530
[c000000f1680bc60] [c000000000032e64] eeh_handle_event+0x174/0x350
[c000000f1680bd10] [c000000000033228] eeh_event_handler+0x1e8/0x1f0
[c000000f1680bdc0] [c0000000000d384c] kthread+0x14c/0x190
[c000000f1680be30] [c00000000000b5a0] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0xbc

Fixes: f83f3c515654("kernfs: fix locking around kernfs_ops->release()
callback")
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 fs/kernfs/file.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/kernfs/file.c b/fs/kernfs/file.c
index 8e4dc7a..ac2dfe0 100644
--- a/fs/kernfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/kernfs/file.c
@@ -809,7 +809,8 @@ void kernfs_drain_open_files(struct kernfs_node *kn)
 		if (kn->flags & KERNFS_HAS_MMAP)
 			unmap_mapping_range(inode->i_mapping, 0, 0, 1);
 
-		kernfs_release_file(kn, of);
+		if (kn->flags & KERNFS_HAS_RELEASE)
+			kernfs_release_file(kn, of);
 	}
 
 	mutex_unlock(&kernfs_open_file_mutex);
-- 
2.9.3

             reply	other threads:[~2017-03-14  2:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-14  2:47 Vaibhav Jain [this message]
2017-03-14  3:08 ` [PATCH] kernfs: Check KERNFS_HAS_RELEASE before calling kernfs_release_file() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-03-16 21:14   ` Tejun Heo
2017-03-17  1:25     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-03-16 21:13 ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170314024700.6167-1-vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=fbarrat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).