From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] powerpc/64s: idle do not hold reservation longer than required
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 18:13:28 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170316124328.GE16462@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170314092349.10981-8-npiggin@gmail.com>
Hi Nick,
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 07:23:48PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> When taking the core idle state lock, grab it immediately like a
> regular lock, rather than adding more tests in there. Holding the lock
> keeps it stable, so there is no need to do it whole holding the
> reservation.
I agree with this patch. Just a minor query
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_book3s.S | 20 +++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_book3s.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_book3s.S
> index 1c91dc35c559..3cb75907c5c5 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_book3s.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_book3s.S
> @@ -488,12 +488,12 @@ BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
> CHECK_HMI_INTERRUPT
> END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_HVMODE)
>
> - lbz r7,PACA_THREAD_MASK(r13)
> ld r14,PACA_CORE_IDLE_STATE_PTR(r13)
> -lwarx_loop2:
> - lwarx r15,0,r14
> - andis. r9,r15,PNV_CORE_IDLE_LOCK_BIT@h
> + lbz r7,PACA_THREAD_MASK(r13)
Is reversing the order of loads into r7 and r14 intentional?
Other than that,
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> +
> /*
> + * Take the core lock to synchronize against other threads.
> + *
> * Lock bit is set in one of the 2 cases-
> * a. In the sleep/winkle enter path, the last thread is executing
> * fastsleep workaround code.
> @@ -501,7 +501,14 @@ lwarx_loop2:
> * workaround undo code or resyncing timebase or restoring context
> * In either case loop until the lock bit is cleared.
> */
> +1:
> + lwarx r15,0,r14
> + andis. r9,r15,PNV_CORE_IDLE_LOCK_BIT@h
> bnel- core_idle_lock_held
> + oris r15,r15,PNV_CORE_IDLE_LOCK_BIT@h
> + stwcx. r15,0,r14
> + bne- 1b
> + isync
>
> andi. r9,r15,PNV_CORE_IDLE_THREAD_BITS
> cmpwi cr2,r9,0
> @@ -513,11 +520,6 @@ lwarx_loop2:
> * cr4 - gt or eq if waking up from complete hypervisor state loss.
> */
>
> - oris r15,r15,PNV_CORE_IDLE_LOCK_BIT@h
> - stwcx. r15,0,r14
> - bne- lwarx_loop2
> - isync
> -
> BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
> lbz r4,PACA_SUBCORE_SIBLING_MASK(r13)
> and r4,r4,r15
> --
> 2.11.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-16 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-14 9:23 [PATCH 0/8] idle fixes and changes for POWER8 and POWER9 Nicholas Piggin
2017-03-14 9:23 ` [PATCH 1/8] powerpc/64s: move remaining system reset idle code into idle_book3s.S Nicholas Piggin
2017-03-14 9:23 ` [PATCH 2/8] powerpc/64s: stop using bit in HSPRG0 to test winkle Nicholas Piggin
2017-03-16 11:14 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2017-03-14 9:23 ` [PATCH 3/8] powerpc/64s: use alternative feature patching Nicholas Piggin
2017-03-16 11:21 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2017-03-14 9:23 ` [PATCH 4/8] powerpc/64s: fix POWER9 machine check handler from stop state Nicholas Piggin
2017-03-16 12:40 ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
2017-03-16 13:05 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-03-16 13:19 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2017-03-20 5:22 ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
2017-03-17 2:49 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-03-17 5:15 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-03-14 9:23 ` [PATCH 5/8] powerpc/64s: use PACA_THREAD_IDLE_STATE only in POWER8 Nicholas Piggin
2017-03-16 11:54 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2017-03-16 12:16 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-03-14 9:23 ` [PATCH 6/8] powerpc/64s: idle expand usable core idle state bits Nicholas Piggin
2017-03-16 12:10 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2017-03-14 9:23 ` [PATCH 7/8] powerpc/64s: idle do not hold reservation longer than required Nicholas Piggin
2017-03-16 12:43 ` Gautham R Shenoy [this message]
2017-03-16 12:55 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-03-14 9:23 ` [PATCH 8/8] powerpc/64s: idle POWER8 avoid full state loss recovery when possible Nicholas Piggin
2017-03-16 16:12 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2017-03-17 5:24 ` Nicholas Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170316124328.GE16462@in.ibm.com \
--to=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).