linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/powernv/cpuidle: Pass correct drv->cpumask for registration
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 12:23:07 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170318064425.GC4225@drishya.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1489814882.5616.11.camel@neuling.org>

* Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> [2017-03-18 16:28:02]:

> Vaidy,
> 
> Thanks for fixing this.
> 
> > drv->cpumask defaults to cpu_possible_mask in __cpuidle_driver_init().
> > This breaks cpuidle on powernv where sysfs files are not created for
> > cpus in cpu_possible_mask that cannot be hot-added.
> 
> I think I prefer the longer description below than this.

[PATCH] powerpc/powernv/cpuidle: Pass correct drv->cpumask for

drv->cpumask defaults to cpu_possible_mask in __cpuidle_driver_init().
This breaks cpuidle on powernv where sysfs files are not created for
cpus in cpu_possible_mask that cannot be hot-added.

On powernv platform cpu_present could be less than cpu_possible
in cases where firmware detects the cpu, but it is not available
for OS.  Such cpus are not hotplugable at runtime on powernv and
hence we skip creating sysfs files for these cpus.

Trying cpuidle_register_device() on cpu without sysfs node will
cause crash like:

cpu 0xf: Vector: 380 (Data SLB Access) at [c000000ff1503490]
    pc: c00000000022c8bc: string+0x34/0x60
    lr: c00000000022ed78: vsnprintf+0x284/0x42c
    sp: c000000ff1503710
   msr: 9000000000009033
   dar: 6000000060000000
  current = 0xc000000ff1480000
  paca    = 0xc00000000fe82d00   softe: 0        irq_happened: 0x01
    pid   = 1, comm = swapper/8
Linux version 4.11.0-rc2 (sv@sagarika) (gcc version 4.9.4 (Buildroot 2017.02-00004-gc28573e) ) #15 SMP Fri Mar 17 19:32:02 IST 2017
enter ? for help
[link register   ] c00000000022ed78 vsnprintf+0x284/0x42c
[c000000ff1503710] c00000000022ebb8 vsnprintf+0xc4/0x42c (unreliable)
[c000000ff1503800] c00000000022ef40 vscnprintf+0x20/0x44
[c000000ff1503830] c0000000000ab61c vprintk_emit+0x94/0x2cc
[c000000ff15038a0] c0000000000acc9c vprintk_func+0x60/0x74
[c000000ff15038c0] c000000000619694 printk+0x38/0x4c
[c000000ff15038e0] c000000000224950 kobject_get+0x40/0x60
[c000000ff1503950] c00000000022507c kobject_add_internal+0x60/0x2c4
[c000000ff15039e0] c000000000225350 kobject_init_and_add+0x70/0x78
[c000000ff1503a60] c00000000053c288 cpuidle_add_sysfs+0x9c/0xe0
[c000000ff1503ae0] c00000000053aeac cpuidle_register_device+0xd4/0x12c
[c000000ff1503b30] c00000000053b108 cpuidle_register+0x98/0xcc
[c000000ff1503bc0] c00000000085eaf0 powernv_processor_idle_init+0x140/0x1e0
[c000000ff1503c60] c00000000000cd60 do_one_initcall+0xc0/0x15c
[c000000ff1503d20] c000000000833e84 kernel_init_freeable+0x1a0/0x25c
[c000000ff1503dc0] c00000000000d478 kernel_init+0x24/0x12c
[c000000ff1503e30] c00000000000b564 ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x78

This patch fixes the issue by passing correct cpumask from
powernv-cpuidle driver.
 
> > This patch fixes the issue by passing correct cpumask from
> > powernv-cpuidle driver.
> 
> Any reason the correct fix isn't to change __cpuidle_driver_init() to use
> present mask?  Seems like any arch where present < possible is going to hit
> this.

How to handle the sysfs nodes for cpus that are not in cpu_present
mask is upto the arch/platform.  During init, arch can choose to
create sysfs nodes for cpu's that are not in present mask, which can
be later hot-added and then onlined.  In which case cpuidle driver
should register for such cpus as well.

The decision to allow a cpu to become available in cpu_present mask at
runtime and handle the sysfs nodes are upto the arch/platform and not
to be hard coded in generic driver.  The generic cpuidle would like to
register for all possible cpus if the arch driver does not override
it.

--Vaidy

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-18  6:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-17 18:05 [PATCH] powerpc/powernv/cpuidle: Pass correct drv->cpumask for registration Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2017-03-18  5:28 ` Michael Neuling
2017-03-18  6:53   ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan [this message]
2017-03-20  3:05     ` Michael Ellerman
2017-03-20  4:31       ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2017-03-22 10:55         ` Michael Ellerman
2017-03-23  3:59           ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2017-03-19  5:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170318064425.GC4225@drishya.in.ibm.com \
    --to=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).