From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-x244.google.com (mail-pg0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3vqG083jVyzDq95 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 18:54:16 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-pg0-x244.google.com with SMTP id 81so1606988pgh.3 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:54:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:54:06 -0700 From: Nicolin Chen To: Daniel Baluta Cc: Timur Tabi , Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com, fabio.estevam@nxp.com, Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Daniel Baluta , mihai.serban@nxp.com, viorel.suman@nxp.com, shengjiu.wang@nxp.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: WM8962: Let codec driver enable/disable its MCLK Message-ID: <20170324075405.GA2000@Asurada> References: <1490270510-17061-1-git-send-email-daniel.baluta@gmail.com> <20170324045814.GA15344@Asurada-CZ80> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 09:37:00AM +0200, Daniel Baluta wrote: > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Nicolin Chen wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 02:01:50PM +0200, Daniel Baluta wrote: > >> From: Nicolin Chen > >> > >> WM8962 needs its MCLK when powerup in wm8962_resume(). Thus it's better > >> to control the MCLK in codec driver. Thus remove the clock enable in > >> machine dirver accordingly. > >> > >> While at it, get rid of imx_wm8962_remove function since it is now > >> empty. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen > > > > Hmm...it'd probably be better to let yourself be the author and remove > > my signed-off here. Just got an email deliver failure since that email > > address is apparently not available any more. > > Hi Nic, > > I will fix the prefix subject as suggested. Is it OK to use > your current email address for the signed-off-by tag? The email address in the "From" would probably still remain that one, which causes the problem. I personally prefer that you resend it using your own and I could give an Ack to it. It isn't really necessary to let me take the credit :) Thanks Nicolin