From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3w3Ym96zw7zDq7g for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 18:26:33 +1000 (AEST) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:26:28 +0200 From: Jiri Olsa To: "Jin, Yao" Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com, kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, treeze.taeung@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] perf report: Show branch type Message-ID: <20170413082628.GB4784@krava> References: <1491949266-6835-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> <20170412105839.GC14409@krava> <74ee84f8-e756-65d2-9ba4-b560f6e241bd@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:25:39AM +0800, Jin, Yao wrote: SNIP > > > > Now it works without my patch and it runs with latest perf/core branch. > > So it looks like a regression issue. > > > > Thanks > > Jin Yao > > > > > > I have tested, the regression issue is happened after this commit: > > bdd97ca perf tools: Refactor the code to strip command name with {l,r}trim() > > CC to the author for double checking. cool, thanks jirka