linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] powerpc: kprobes: fix handling of function offsets on ABIv2
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 13:28:04 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170413132804.0db5e64a2ee6e9b2130719bb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dcf77485d32f1a49d0c79a5be7e038491c10ea2a.1491991939.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:28:25 +0530
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> commit 239aeba76409 ("perf powerpc: Fix kprobe and kretprobe handling
> with kallsyms on ppc64le") changed how we use the offset field in struct
> kprobe on ABIv2. perf now offsets from the GEP (Global entry point) if an
> offset is specified and otherwise chooses the LEP (Local entry point).
> 
> Fix the same in kernel for kprobe API users. We do this by extending
> kprobe_lookup_name() to accept an additional parameter to indicate the
> offset specified with the kprobe registration. If offset is 0, we return
> the local function entry and return the global entry point otherwise.
> 
> With:
> 	# cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/
> 	# echo "p _do_fork" >> kprobe_events
> 	# echo "p _do_fork+0x10" >> kprobe_events
> 
> before this patch:
> 	# cat ../kprobes/list
> 	c0000000000d0748  k  _do_fork+0x8    [DISABLED]
> 	c0000000000d0758  k  _do_fork+0x18    [DISABLED]
> 	c0000000000412b0  k  kretprobe_trampoline+0x0    [OPTIMIZED]
> 
> and after:
> 	# cat ../kprobes/list
> 	c0000000000d04c8  k  _do_fork+0x8    [DISABLED]
> 	c0000000000d04d0  k  _do_fork+0x10    [DISABLED]
> 	c0000000000412b0  k  kretprobe_trampoline+0x0    [OPTIMIZED]
> 
> Acked-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c   | 4 ++--
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c | 4 ++--
>  include/linux/kprobes.h         | 2 +-
>  kernel/kprobes.c                | 7 ++++---
>  4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
> index a7aa7394954d..0732a0291ace 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -42,14 +42,14 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe_ctlblk, kprobe_ctlblk);
>  
>  struct kretprobe_blackpoint kretprobe_blacklist[] = {{NULL, NULL}};
>  
> -kprobe_opcode_t *kprobe_lookup_name(const char *name)
> +kprobe_opcode_t *kprobe_lookup_name(const char *name, unsigned int offset)

Hmm, if we do this change, it is natural that kprobe_lookup_name()
returns the address + offset.

Thank you,



-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-13  4:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-12 10:58 [PATCH v2 0/5] powerpc: a few kprobe fixes and refactoring Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] kprobes: convert kprobe_lookup_name() to a function Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-13  3:09   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-04-18 12:52   ` David Laight
2017-04-19  8:08     ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-19  8:48       ` David Laight
2017-04-19 11:07         ` 'Naveen N. Rao'
2017-04-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] powerpc: kprobes: fix handling of function offsets on ABIv2 Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-13  4:28   ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2017-04-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] powerpc: introduce a new helper to obtain function entry points Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-13  4:32   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-04-13  5:52     ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] powerpc: kprobes: factor out code to emulate instruction into a helper Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-13  4:34   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-04-13  5:53     ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-13  8:50     ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] powerpc: kprobes: emulate instructions on kprobe handler re-entry Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-13  4:37   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-04-13  5:53     ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-13  3:02 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] powerpc: a few kprobe fixes and refactoring Masami Hiramatsu
2017-04-13  5:50   ` Naveen N. Rao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170413132804.0db5e64a2ee6e9b2130719bb@kernel.org \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).