From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: mhocko@kernel.org, pasha.tatashin@oracle.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [v3 0/9] parallelized "struct page" zeroing
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 14:11:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170510211131.GD1590@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170510.140026.1367439672848112283.davem@davemloft.net>
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 02:00:26PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 10:17:03 -0700
> > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 11:19:43AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> >> I guess it might be clearer if you understand what the block
> >> initializing stores do on sparc64. There are no memory accesses at
> >> all.
> >>
> >> The cpu just zeros out the cache line, that's it.
> >>
> >> No L3 cache line is allocated. So this "wipe everything" behavior
> >> will not happen in the L3.
> >
> > There's either something wrong with your explanation or my reading
> > skills :-)
> >
> > "There are no memory accesses"
> > "No L3 cache line is allocated"
> >
> > You can have one or the other ... either the CPU sends a cacheline-sized
> > write of zeroes to memory without allocating an L3 cache line (maybe
> > using the store buffer?), or the CPU allocates an L3 cache line and sets
> > its contents to zeroes, probably putting it in the last way of the set
> > so it's the first thing to be evicted if not touched.
>
> There is no conflict in what I said.
>
> Only an L2 cache line is allocated and cleared. L3 is left alone.
I thought SPARC had inclusive caches. So allocating an L2 cacheline
would necessitate allocating an L3 cacheline. Or is this an exception
to the normal order of things?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-10 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-05 17:03 [v3 0/9] parallelized "struct page" zeroing Pavel Tatashin
2017-05-05 17:03 ` [v3 1/9] sparc64: simplify vmemmap_populate Pavel Tatashin
2017-05-05 17:03 ` [v3 2/9] mm: defining memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_raw Pavel Tatashin
2017-05-05 17:03 ` [v3 3/9] mm: add "zero" argument to vmemmap allocators Pavel Tatashin
2017-05-13 19:17 ` kbuild test robot
2017-05-05 17:03 ` [v3 4/9] mm: do not zero vmemmap_buf Pavel Tatashin
2017-05-05 17:03 ` [v3 5/9] mm: zero struct pages during initialization Pavel Tatashin
2017-05-05 17:03 ` [v3 6/9] sparc64: teach sparc not to zero struct pages memory Pavel Tatashin
2017-05-05 17:03 ` [v3 7/9] x86: teach x86 " Pavel Tatashin
2017-05-05 17:03 ` [v3 8/9] powerpc: teach platforms " Pavel Tatashin
2017-05-05 17:03 ` [v3 9/9] s390: " Pavel Tatashin
2017-05-08 11:36 ` Heiko Carstens
2017-05-15 18:24 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-05-15 23:17 ` Heiko Carstens
2017-05-16 0:33 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-05-09 18:12 ` [v3 0/9] parallelized "struct page" zeroing Michal Hocko
2017-05-09 18:54 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-05-10 7:24 ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-10 13:42 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-05-10 14:57 ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-10 15:01 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-05-10 15:20 ` David Miller
2017-05-11 20:47 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-05-11 20:59 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-05-12 16:57 ` David Miller
2017-05-12 17:24 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-05-12 17:37 ` David Miller
2017-05-16 23:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-05-12 16:56 ` David Miller
2017-05-10 15:19 ` David Miller
2017-05-10 17:17 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-05-10 18:00 ` David Miller
2017-05-10 21:11 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2017-05-11 8:05 ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-11 14:35 ` David Miller
2017-05-15 18:12 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-05-15 19:38 ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-15 20:44 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-05-16 8:36 ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-26 16:45 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-05-29 11:53 ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-30 17:16 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-05-31 16:31 ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-31 16:51 ` David Miller
2017-06-01 3:35 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-06-01 8:46 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170510211131.GD1590@bombadil.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).