From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from newverein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3wVt386WHTzDqFT for ; Sun, 21 May 2017 17:00:20 +1000 (AEST) Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 09:00:17 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Thomas Gleixner , Mark Gross , Tejun Heo , linuxppc-dev , linux-s390 , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] timers: provide a "modern" variant of timers Message-ID: <20170521070017.GA13082@lst.de> References: <20170516114812.10660-1-hch@lst.de> <20170516114812.10660-3-hch@lst.de> <20170518082448.GB3812@lst.de> <20170518084136.GA5331@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:57:31AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > How expensive would it be to add another field to timer_list and > just have both pointers? That would add 4/8 bytes to every structure containing a timer, so I'd rather avoid it if possible. But one option might be to inflict this onto users of outdated compilers and use the union for modern ones.