linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, npiggin@gmail.com,
	mikey@neuling.org, cyrilbur@gmail.com,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/64: Use tick accounting by default
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 15:13:13 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170522151313.3f60aca2@kryten> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87shjxsf0i.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>

Hi Michael,

> > ppc64 is the only architecture that turns on
> > VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE by default. The overhead of this option
> > is extremely high - a context switch microbenchmark using
> > sched_yield() is almost 20% slower.  
> 
> Running on what? It should all be nop'ed out unless you're on a
> platform that needs it (SPLPAR).

POWERNV native. We don't nop out all the vtime_account_* gunk do we? It
is all those functions that are a large part of the problem.

> > To get finer grained user/hardirq/softirq statitics, the
> > IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING option can be used instead, which has much lower
> > overhead.  
> 
> Can it? We don't select HAVE_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING, so AFAICS it can't
> be enabled.

I have a separate patch to enable it.

> Doesn't dropping this mean we never count stolen time?

Perhaps. Do we have any applications left that care?

Anton

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-05-22  5:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-19 14:41 [PATCH] powerpc/64: Use tick accounting by default Anton Blanchard
2017-05-22  4:15 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-05-22  4:46   ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-05-22  5:13   ` Anton Blanchard [this message]
2022-05-25  8:36     ` Christophe Leroy
2017-05-22  7:26 ` Christophe LEROY

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170522151313.3f60aca2@kryten \
    --to=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=cyrilbur@gmail.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).