From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Gustavo Romero <gusbromero@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/kernel: improve FP and vector registers restoration
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 11:34:05 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170604143403.c7kekgvnfigc43x3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170604113814.6c04fae8@kryten>
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 11:38:14AM +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Jun 2017 19:42:14 -0300
> Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Anton,
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 08:04:11AM +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > > Hi Breno,
> > >
> > > > Currently tsk->thread->load_vec and load_fp are not initialized
> > > > during a task creation, which set garbage to these variables
> > > > (non-zero value).
> > >
> > > Nice catch! It seems like we should zero load_tm too though?
> >
> > Yes, it seems we need to zero load_tm also, since it does not seem to
> > be zeroed anywhere else.
> >
> > But I did some tests, and load_tm is always zero after start_thread()
> > is being called.
> >
> > In fact, start_thread() is being called and pt_regs->load_tm is
> > already zero since the function start.
> >
> > I also wrote a SystemTap script[1] to investigate it better, and I've
> > never seen a single load_tm != 0 in a my machine. I tested on both
> > POWER8 bare metal and KVM guests. (load_vec and load_fp happened to
> > have garbage all the time)
> >
> > Any idea if this is just occasional event, or, if there is someone
> > zeroing it in an obscure code?
>
> Quite likely no one uses TM :) Try:
In fact, I had tested with TM[1] and haven't seen any issue, but I was not
calling a nested application (through execve() syscall). Somehow if I
call "$ ./tm_application ; /bin/true", I do not see a non-zero load_tm
in the new task->thread.
On the other side, I see the corruption with your test case, mainly if I
sleep after 'tbegin.' and before execlp(), giving a chance to have
load_tm incremented, and this value is being inherited in the new
task->thread.
This is obviously wrong, I will send a patch to have it fixed.
Thanks for the guidance!
[1] https://github.com/leitao/htm_torture
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-04 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-02 21:43 [PATCH] powerpc/kernel: improve FP and vector registers restoration Breno Leitao
2017-06-02 22:04 ` Anton Blanchard
2017-06-03 22:42 ` Breno Leitao
2017-06-04 1:38 ` Anton Blanchard
2017-06-04 14:34 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2017-06-05 5:59 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-06-08 4:05 ` Michael Ellerman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-06-02 20:56 [PATCH] " Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170604143403.c7kekgvnfigc43x3@gmail.com \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=gusbromero@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).