From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] watchdog: introduce arch_touch_nmi_watchdog()
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 12:43:25 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170617124325.58ad25cb@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170616112117.a33b1096985a786777bc8b54@linux-foundation.org>
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 11:21:17 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:57:12 +1000 Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > For architectures that define HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG, instead of having
> > them provide the complete touch_nmi_watchdog() function, just have
> > them provide arch_touch_nmi_watchdog().
> >
> > This gives the generic code more flexibility in implementing this
> > function, and arch implementations don't miss out on touching the
> > softlockup watchdog or other generic details.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > --- a/arch/blackfin/include/asm/nmi.h
> > +++ b/arch/blackfin/include/asm/nmi.h
> > @@ -9,4 +9,6 @@
> >
> > #include <linux/nmi.h>
> >
> > +extern void arch_touch_nmi_watchdog(void);
>
> Do we actually need to add this to the arch header files...
[snip]
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR) || defined(CONFIG_HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG)
> > +extern void arch_touch_nmi_watchdog(void);
> > +#else
> > +static inline void arch_touch_nmi_watchdog(void) {}
> > +#endif
> > +
>
> given that we have a global declaration here?
Probably not. I think it was a holdover from an earlier version where
I tried to let the arch declare it (one of the little embedded ones
had a comment somewhere saying it would be nice if they could make it
inline).
There was some difficulty with it, so yes let's remove these and do
that next time.
Thanks,
Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-17 2:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-16 6:57 [PATCH v4 0/5] Improve watchdog config for arch watchdogs Nicholas Piggin
2017-06-16 6:57 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] watchdog: remove unused declaration Nicholas Piggin
2017-06-16 6:57 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] watchdog: introduce arch_touch_nmi_watchdog() Nicholas Piggin
2017-06-16 18:21 ` Andrew Morton
2017-06-17 2:43 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2017-06-16 6:57 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] watchdog: split up config options Nicholas Piggin
2017-06-17 12:35 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-06-16 6:57 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] watchdog: provide watchdog_reconfigure() for arch watchdogs Nicholas Piggin
2017-06-16 18:24 ` Andrew Morton
2017-06-17 2:59 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-06-16 6:57 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] powerpc/64s: implement arch-specific hardlockup watchdog Nicholas Piggin
2017-06-16 14:50 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Improve watchdog config for arch watchdogs Don Zickus
2017-06-16 17:16 ` Babu Moger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170617124325.58ad25cb@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=babu.moger@oracle.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).