linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ntb@googlegroups.com, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] asm-generic/io.h: make ioread64 and iowrite64 universally available
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 21:14:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170622211431.14270378@alans-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170622164817.25515-4-logang@deltatee.com>

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 10:48:13 -0600
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> wrote:

> Currently, ioread64 and iowrite64 are only available io CONFIG_64BIT=y
> and CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP=n. Thus, seeing the functions are not
> universally available, it makes them unusable for driver developers.
> This leads to ugly hacks such as those at the top of
> 
> drivers/ntb/hw/intel/ntb_hw_intel.c
> 
> This patch adds fallback implementations for when CONFIG_64BIT and
> CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP are not set. These functions use two io32 based
> calls to complete the operation.
> 
> Note, we do not use the volatile keyword in these functions like the
> others in the same file. It is necessary to avoid a compiler warning
> on arm.

This is a really really bad idea as per the Alpha comment.

ioread64 and iowrite64 generate a single 64bit bus transaction. There is
hardware where mmio operations have side effects so simply using a pair
of 32bit operations blindly does not work (consider something as trivial
as reading a 64bit performance counter or incrementing pointer).

If a platform doesn't support 64bit I/O operations from the CPU then you
either need to use some kind of platform/architecture specific interface
if present or accept you don't have one.

It's not safe to split it. Possibly for some use cases you could add an

ioread64_maysplit()

but you cannot blindly break ioread64/write64() and expect it to
magically allow you to use drivers that depend upon it.

What btw is the actual ARM compiler warning ? Is the compiler also trying
to tell you it's a bad idea ?

Alan

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-22 20:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-22 16:48 [PATCH 0/7] cleanup issues with io{read|write}64 Logan Gunthorpe
2017-06-22 16:48 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/tilcdc: don't use volatile with iowrite64 Logan Gunthorpe
2017-06-26  8:54   ` Jyri Sarha
2017-06-22 16:48 ` [PATCH 2/7] iomap: implement ioread64 and iowrite64 Logan Gunthorpe
2017-06-26 20:43   ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-06-26 21:25     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-06-22 16:48 ` [PATCH 3/7] asm-generic/io.h: make ioread64 and iowrite64 universally available Logan Gunthorpe
2017-06-22 20:14   ` Alan Cox [this message]
2017-06-22 20:24     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-06-22 20:36       ` Alan Cox
2017-06-22 20:38         ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-06-22 16:48 ` [PATCH 4/7] alpha: provide ioread64 and iowrite64 implementations Logan Gunthorpe
2017-06-22 17:29   ` Stephen  Bates
2017-06-22 17:30     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-06-22 20:08   ` Alan Cox
2017-06-22 20:09     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-06-22 21:03       ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-06-22 21:10         ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-06-22 21:20   ` Richard Henderson
2017-06-22 16:48 ` [PATCH 5/7] ntb: ntb_hw_intel: remove ioread64 and iowrite64 hacks Logan Gunthorpe
2017-06-22 17:17   ` Jiang, Dave
2017-06-22 16:48 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/tilcdc: clean up ifdef hacks around iowrite64 Logan Gunthorpe
2017-06-26  8:55   ` Jyri Sarha
2017-06-26 16:26     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-06-27 20:40       ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-06-22 16:48 ` [PATCH 7/7] crypto: caam: cleanup CONFIG_64BIT ifdefs when using io{read|write}64 Logan Gunthorpe
2017-06-23  6:51   ` Horia Geantă
2017-06-23 17:59     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-06-24 11:57       ` [PATCH v2 " Horia Geantă

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170622211431.14270378@alans-desktop \
    --to=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ntb@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=sbates@raithlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).