linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] trace/kprobes: Sanitize derived event names
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 02:30:31 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170624023031.8eade91e3510c8208050137f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170622190345.6444-1-naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 00:33:45 +0530
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> On 2017/06/22 06:29PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 00:20:27 +0530
> > "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > When we derive event names, convert some expected symbols (such as ':'
> > > used to specify module:name and '.' present in some symbols) into
> > > underscores so that the event name is not rejected.
> > 
> > Oops, ok, this is my mistake.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> > 
> > This must be marked as bugfix for stable trees.
> > 
> > Could you also add a testcase for this (module name) bug?
> > 
> > MODNAME=`lsmod | head -n 2 | tail -n 1 | cut -f 1 -d " "`
> > FUNCNAME=`grep -m 1 "\\[$MODNAME\\]" /proc/kallsyms | xargs | cut -f 3 -d " "`
> > 
> > May gives you a target name :)
> 
> Sure. Here is a test.
> 
> Thanks for the review,
> Naveen
> 
> -
> [PATCH] selftests/ftrace: Add a test to probe module functions
> 
> Add a kprobes test to ensure that we are able to add a probe on a
> module function using 'p <mod>:<func>' format, without having to
> specify a probe name.
> 
> Suggested-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Perfect! :)

Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

Thanks!

> ---
>  .../testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/probe_module.tc | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/probe_module.tc
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/probe_module.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/probe_module.tc
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ea7657041ba6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/probe_module.tc
> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> +#!/bin/sh
> +# description: Kprobe dynamic event - probing module
> +
> +[ -f kprobe_events ] || exit_unsupported # this is configurable
> +
> +echo 0 > events/enable
> +echo > kprobe_events
> +export MOD=`lsmod | head -n 2 | tail -n 1 | cut -f1 -d" "`
> +export FUNC=`grep -m 1 ".* t .*\\[$MOD\\]" /proc/kallsyms | xargs | cut -f3 -d" "`
> +[ "x" != "x$MOD" -a "y" != "y$FUNC" ] || exit_untested
> +echo p $MOD:$FUNC > kprobe_events
> +grep $MOD kprobe_events
> +echo > kprobe_events
> +clear_trace
> -- 
> 2.13.1
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-23 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-21 18:50 [PATCH 0/2] A couple of small updates/fixes for kprobes tracer Naveen N. Rao
2017-06-21 18:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] trace/kprobes: Sanitize derived event names Naveen N. Rao
2017-06-22  9:29   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-06-22 19:03     ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-06-23 17:30       ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2017-06-21 18:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/ftrace: Update multiple kprobes test for powerpc Naveen N. Rao
2017-06-22  9:07   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-06-22 17:03     ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-06-23 17:30       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-06-24 11:06         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-06-28  9:28           ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-06-28 14:16             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-06-28 18:43               ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-06-29  0:57                 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-06-29 13:08                   ` Naveen N. Rao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170624023031.8eade91e3510c8208050137f@kernel.org \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).