linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: mikey@neuling.org, Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] powerpc/smp: Use cpu_to_chip_id() to find core siblings
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:12:53 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170629071256.8159-2-oohall@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170629071256.8159-1-oohall@gmail.com>

When building the CPU scheduler topology the kernel uses the ibm,chipid
property from the devicetree to group logical CPUs. Currently the DT
search for this property is open-coded in smp.c and this functionality
is a duplication of what's in cpu_to_chip_id() already. This patch
removes the existing search in favor of that.

It's worth mentioning that the semantics of the search are different
in cpu_to_chip_id(). When there is no ibm,chipid in the CPUs node it
will also search /cpus and / for the property, but this should not
effect the output topology.

Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 37 +++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
index dbcd22e09a2c..40f1f268be83 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
@@ -829,19 +829,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_first_thread_of_core);
 
 static void traverse_siblings_chip_id(int cpu, bool add, int chipid)
 {
-	const struct cpumask *mask;
-	struct device_node *np;
-	int i, plen;
-	const __be32 *prop;
+	const struct cpumask *mask = add ? cpu_online_mask : cpu_present_mask;
+	int i;
 
-	mask = add ? cpu_online_mask : cpu_present_mask;
 	for_each_cpu(i, mask) {
-		np = of_get_cpu_node(i, NULL);
-		if (!np)
-			continue;
-		prop = of_get_property(np, "ibm,chip-id", &plen);
-		if (prop && plen == sizeof(int) &&
-		    of_read_number(prop, 1) == chipid) {
+		if (cpu_to_chip_id(i) == chipid) {
 			if (add) {
 				cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_core_mask(i));
 				cpumask_set_cpu(i, cpu_core_mask(cpu));
@@ -850,7 +842,6 @@ static void traverse_siblings_chip_id(int cpu, bool add, int chipid)
 				cpumask_clear_cpu(i, cpu_core_mask(cpu));
 			}
 		}
-		of_node_put(np);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -880,21 +871,15 @@ static void traverse_core_siblings(int cpu, bool add)
 {
 	struct device_node *l2_cache, *np;
 	const struct cpumask *mask;
-	int i, chip, plen;
-	const __be32 *prop;
+	int chip_id;
+	int i;
 
-	/* First see if we have ibm,chip-id properties in cpu nodes */
-	np = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
-	if (np) {
-		chip = -1;
-		prop = of_get_property(np, "ibm,chip-id", &plen);
-		if (prop && plen == sizeof(int))
-			chip = of_read_number(prop, 1);
-		of_node_put(np);
-		if (chip >= 0) {
-			traverse_siblings_chip_id(cpu, add, chip);
-			return;
-		}
+	/* threads that share a chip-id are considered siblings */
+	chip_id = cpu_to_chip_id(cpu);
+
+	if (chip_id >= 0) {
+		traverse_siblings_chip_id(cpu, add, chip_id);
+		return;
 	}
 
 	l2_cache = cpu_to_l2cache(cpu);
-- 
2.9.4

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-29  7:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-29  7:12 power9 shared caches support Oliver O'Halloran
2017-06-29  7:12 ` Oliver O'Halloran [this message]
2017-09-01 13:29   ` [1/4] powerpc/smp: Use cpu_to_chip_id() to find core siblings Michael Ellerman
2017-06-29  7:12 ` [PATCH 2/4] powerpc/smp: Rework CPU topology construction Oliver O'Halloran
2017-06-29  7:12 ` [PATCH 3/4] powerpc/smp: Add cpu_l2_cache_map Oliver O'Halloran
2017-06-29  7:12 ` [PATCH 4/4] powerpc/smp: Add Power9 scheduler topology Oliver O'Halloran
2017-08-31  7:30   ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-31 12:33   ` Srikar Dronamraju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170629071256.8159-2-oohall@gmail.com \
    --to=oohall@gmail.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).