linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] powerpc64/elfv1: Only dereference function descriptor for non-text symbols
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 20:49:45 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170629204945.03bf29b8@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46b6f6aaec8dd297c2d8e811c82dc2303ff13508.1498732172.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:11:04 +0530
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> Currently, we assume that the function pointer we receive in
> ppc_function_entry() points to a function descriptor. However, this is
> not always the case. In particular, assembly symbols without the right
> annotation do not have an associated function descriptor. Some of these
> symbols are added to the kprobe blacklist using _ASM_NOKPROBE_SYMBOL().
> 
> When such addresses are subsequently processed through
> arch_deref_entry_point() in populate_kprobe_blacklist(), we see the
> below errors during bootup:
>     [    0.663963] Failed to find blacklist at 7d9b02a648029b6c
>     [    0.663970] Failed to find blacklist at a14d03d0394a0001
>     [    0.663972] Failed to find blacklist at 7d5302a6f94d0388
>     [    0.663973] Failed to find blacklist at 48027d11e8610178
>     [    0.663974] Failed to find blacklist at f8010070f8410080
>     [    0.663976] Failed to find blacklist at 386100704801f89d
>     [    0.663977] Failed to find blacklist at 7d5302a6f94d00b0
> 
> Fix this by checking if the function pointer we receive in
> ppc_function_entry() already points to kernel text. If so, we just
> return it as is. If not, we assume that this is a function descriptor
> and proceed to dereference it.
> 
> Suggested-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h | 10 +++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h
> index abef812de7f8..5482928eea1b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h
> @@ -83,8 +83,16 @@ static inline unsigned long ppc_function_entry(void *func)
>  	 * On PPC64 ABIv1 the function pointer actually points to the
>  	 * function's descriptor. The first entry in the descriptor is the
>  	 * address of the function text.
> +	 *
> +	 * However, we may also receive pointer to an assembly symbol. To
> +	 * detect that, we first check if the function pointer we receive
> +	 * already points to kernel/module text and we only dereference it
> +	 * if it doesn't.
>  	 */
> -	return ((func_descr_t *)func)->entry;
> +	if (kernel_text_address((unsigned long)func))
> +		return (unsigned long)func;
> +	else
> +		return ((func_descr_t *)func)->entry;

This seems good to me now. I guess it should do the right thing with
modules too, looking at kernel_text_address implementation.

Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-29 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-29 10:41 [PATCH v4 0/7] powerpc: build out kprobes blacklist -- series 3 Naveen N. Rao
2017-06-29 10:41 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] powerpc64/elfv1: Only dereference function descriptor for non-text symbols Naveen N. Rao
2017-06-29 10:49   ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2017-06-29 11:48     ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-06-29 10:41 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] powerpc/64s: Convert .L__replay_interrupt_return to a local label Naveen N. Rao
2017-06-29 10:41 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] powerpc/64s: Blacklist system_call() and system_call_common() from kprobes Naveen N. Rao
2017-06-29 10:41 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] powerpc/64s: Move system_call() symbol to just after setting MSR_EE Naveen N. Rao
2017-06-29 11:44   ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-06-29 10:41 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] powerpc/64s: Un-blacklist system_call() from kprobes Naveen N. Rao
2017-06-29 10:55   ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-06-29 11:51     ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-06-29 10:41 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] powerpc/64s: Blacklist functions invoked on a trap Naveen N. Rao
2017-06-29 10:41 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] powerpc/64s: Blacklist rtas entry/exit from kprobes Naveen N. Rao
2017-06-29 11:01   ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-06-29 11:54     ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-06-29 12:13       ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-06-29 16:51         ` Naveen N. Rao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170629204945.03bf29b8@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).