From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-x241.google.com (mail-pf0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3wzSn00w2JzDr61 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 17:28:20 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pf0-x241.google.com with SMTP id z6so16063648pfk.3 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:28:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 17:28:02 +1000 From: Nicholas Piggin To: Abdul Haleem Cc: sachinp , Stephen Rothwell , Paul McKenney , linux-kernel , linux-next , paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev , paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [linux-next] cpus stalls detected few hours after booting next kernel Message-ID: <20170630172802.6d4ddca2@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1498800138.19484.25.camel@abdul> References: <1498728106.19484.21.camel@abdul> <20170629193614.376e27e6@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20170629202305.6187367f@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20170630004534.228f7c08@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> <1498800138.19484.25.camel@abdul> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:52:18 +0530 Abdul Haleem wrote: > On Fri, 2017-06-30 at 00:45 +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 20:23:05 +1000 > > Nicholas Piggin wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 19:36:14 +1000 > > > Nicholas Piggin wrote: > > > > > > I don't *think* the replay-wakeup-interrupt patch is directly involved, but > > > > it's likely to be one of the idle patches. > > > > Okay this turned out to be misconfigured sleep states I added for the > > simulator, sorry for the false alarm. > > > > > Although you have this in the backtrace. I wonder if that's a stuck > > > lock in rcu_process_callbacks? > > > > So this spinlock becomes top of the list of suspects. Can you try > > enabling lockdep and try to reproduce it? > > Yes, recreated again with CONFIG_LOCKDEP=y & CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP=y set. > I do not see any difference in trace messages with and without LOCKDEP > enabled. > > Please find the attached log file. Can you get an rcu_invoke_callback event trace that Paul suggested? Does this bug show up with just the powerpc next branch? Thanks, Nick