From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Akshay Adiga <akshay.adiga@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] powernv:idle: Disable LOSE_FULL_CONTEXT states when stop-api fails.
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 01:29:16 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170707012916.215ed32a@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1499272696-28751-6-git-send-email-ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Wed, 5 Jul 2017 22:08:16 +0530
"Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Currently, we use the opal call opal_slw_set_reg() to inform the that
> the Sleep-Winkle Engine (SLW) to restore the contents of some of the
> Hypervisor state on wakeup from deep idle states that lose full
> hypervisor context (characterized by the flag
> OPAL_PM_LOSE_FULL_CONTEXT).
>
> However, the current code has a bug in that if opal_slw_set_reg()
> fails, we don't disable the use of these deep states (winkle on
> POWER8, stop4 onwards on POWER9).
>
> This patch fixes this bug by ensuring that if the the sleep winkle
> engine is unable to restore the hypervisor states in
> pnv_save_sprs_for_deep_states(), then we mark as invalid the states
> which lose full context.
>
> As a side-effect, since supported_cpuidle_states in
> pnv_probe_idle_states() consists of flags of only the valid states,
> this patch will ensure that no other subsystem in the kernel can use
> the states which lose full context on stop-api failures.
Looks good. Is there something minimal we can do for stable here?
Aside question, do we need to restore LPCR at all with the SLW engine?
It gets set up again when by the idle wakeup code.
And does POWER9 really need MSR and PSSCR restored by SLW? (going a bit
off topic here, I'm just curious)
Thanks,
Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-06 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-05 16:38 [PATCH 0/5] powernv:idle: Cleanup idle states initialization Gautham R. Shenoy
2017-07-05 16:38 ` [PATCH 1/5] powernv:idle: Move device-tree parsing to one place Gautham R. Shenoy
2017-07-06 14:53 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-07-07 11:25 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2017-07-08 8:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-07-05 16:38 ` [PATCH 2/5] powernv:idle: Change return type of pnv_probe_idle_states to int Gautham R. Shenoy
2017-07-06 15:01 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-07-07 12:26 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2017-07-05 16:38 ` [PATCH 3/5] powernv:idle: Define idle init function for power8 Gautham R. Shenoy
2017-07-06 15:06 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-07-07 12:43 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2017-07-05 16:38 ` [PATCH 4/5] powernv:idle: Move initialization of sibling pacas to pnv_alloc_idle_core_states Gautham R. Shenoy
2017-07-06 15:16 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-07-07 15:04 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2017-07-08 9:00 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-07-10 4:34 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-07-05 16:38 ` [PATCH 5/5] powernv:idle: Disable LOSE_FULL_CONTEXT states when stop-api fails Gautham R. Shenoy
2017-07-06 15:29 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2017-07-07 17:37 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2017-07-08 9:05 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-07-11 5:04 ` Gautham R Shenoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170707012916.215ed32a@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=akshay.adiga@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).