From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 8/9] cpufreq: Add CPUFREQ_NO_AUTO_DYNAMIC_SWITCHING cpufreq driver flag
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 18:30:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170719163054.GA32233@light.dominikbrodowski.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <af15ad23b687e819919eeea687ff44bb37b8e9df.1500373914.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1089 bytes --]
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 03:42:48PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The policy->transition_latency field is used for multiple purposes
> today and its not straight forward at all. This is how it is used:
>
> A. Set the correct transition_latency value.
>
> B. Set it to CPUFREQ_ETERNAL because:
> 1. We don't want automatic dynamic switching (with
> ondemand/conservative) to happen at all.
> 2. We don't know the transition latency.
>
> This patch handles the B.1. case in a more readable way. A new flag for
> the cpufreq drivers is added to disallow use of cpufreq governors which
> have dynamic_switching flag set.
>
> All the current cpufreq drivers which are setting transition_latency
> unconditionally to CPUFREQ_ETERNAL are updated to use it. They don't
> need to set transition_latency anymore.
>
> There shouldn't be any functional change after this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Looks good to me, so feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Best,
Dominik
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-19 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-19 10:12 [PATCH V3 0/9] cpufreq: transition-latency cleanups Viresh Kumar
2017-07-19 10:12 ` [PATCH V3 8/9] cpufreq: Add CPUFREQ_NO_AUTO_DYNAMIC_SWITCHING cpufreq driver flag Viresh Kumar
2017-07-19 16:30 ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2017-07-19 12:42 ` [PATCH V3 0/9] cpufreq: transition-latency cleanups Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170719163054.GA32233@light.dominikbrodowski.net \
--to=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).