From: "Lukáš Doktor" <ldoktor@redhat.com>
To: ldoktor@redhat.com, a.zummo@towertech.it,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, sboyd@codeaurora.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, john.stultz@linaro.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, shuah@kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] rtc: rtctest: Improve support detection
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:46:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170815084600.6285-2-ldoktor@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170815084600.6285-1-ldoktor@redhat.com>
The rtc-generic and opal-rtc are failing to run this test as they do not
support all the features. Let's treat the error returns and skip to the
following test.
Theoretically the test_DATE should be also adjusted, but as it's enabled
on demand I think it makes sense to fail in such case.
Signed-off-by: Lukáš Doktor <ldoktor@redhat.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest.c b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest.c
index f61170f..411eff6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest.c
@@ -221,6 +221,11 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
/* Read the current alarm settings */
retval = ioctl(fd, RTC_ALM_READ, &rtc_tm);
if (retval == -1) {
+ if (errno == EINVAL) {
+ fprintf(stderr,
+ "\n...EINVAL reading current alarm setting.\n");
+ goto test_PIE;
+ }
perror("RTC_ALM_READ ioctl");
exit(errno);
}
@@ -231,7 +236,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
/* Enable alarm interrupts */
retval = ioctl(fd, RTC_AIE_ON, 0);
if (retval == -1) {
- if (errno == EINVAL) {
+ if (errno == EINVAL || errno == EIO) {
fprintf(stderr,
"\n...Alarm IRQs not supported.\n");
goto test_PIE;
--
2.9.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-15 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-15 8:45 [PATCH v2 0/1] rtc: rtctest: Support opal-rtc and rtc-generic Lukáš Doktor
2017-08-15 8:46 ` Lukáš Doktor [this message]
2017-08-16 23:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] rtc: rtctest: Improve support detection Shuah Khan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170815084600.6285-2-ldoktor@redhat.com \
--to=ldoktor@redhat.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).