* [PATCH 2/5] powerpc: Fix missing CR before {
2017-08-16 6:01 [PATCH 1/5] powerpc: Test MSR_FP and MSR_VEC when enabling/flushing VSX Benjamin Herrenschmidt
@ 2017-08-16 6:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-08-18 12:51 ` [2/5] " Michael Ellerman
2017-08-16 6:01 ` [PATCH 3/5] powerpc: Remove redundant fp/altivec giveup code Benjamin Herrenschmidt
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2017-08-16 6:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
index 883216b4296a..14b9a3c46c5d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
@@ -230,7 +230,8 @@ void enable_kernel_fp(void)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(enable_kernel_fp);
-static int restore_fp(struct task_struct *tsk) {
+static int restore_fp(struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
if (tsk->thread.load_fp || msr_tm_active(tsk->thread.regs->msr)) {
load_fp_state(¤t->thread.fp_state);
current->thread.load_fp++;
--
2.13.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/5] powerpc: Remove redundant fp/altivec giveup code
2017-08-16 6:01 [PATCH 1/5] powerpc: Test MSR_FP and MSR_VEC when enabling/flushing VSX Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-08-16 6:01 ` [PATCH 2/5] powerpc: Fix missing CR before { Benjamin Herrenschmidt
@ 2017-08-16 6:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-08-16 6:01 ` [PATCH 4/5] powerpc: Remove redundant clear of MSR_VSX in __giveup_vsx() Benjamin Herrenschmidt
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2017-08-16 6:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev
__giveup_vsx already calls those two functions
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
index 14b9a3c46c5d..bfbd6083f841 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
@@ -375,10 +375,6 @@ void enable_kernel_vsx(void)
*/
if(!msr_tm_active(cpumsr) && msr_tm_active(current->thread.regs->msr))
return;
- if (current->thread.regs->msr & MSR_FP)
- __giveup_fpu(current);
- if (current->thread.regs->msr & MSR_VEC)
- __giveup_altivec(current);
__giveup_vsx(current);
}
}
--
2.13.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/5] powerpc: Remove redundant clear of MSR_VSX in __giveup_vsx()
2017-08-16 6:01 [PATCH 1/5] powerpc: Test MSR_FP and MSR_VEC when enabling/flushing VSX Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-08-16 6:01 ` [PATCH 2/5] powerpc: Fix missing CR before { Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-08-16 6:01 ` [PATCH 3/5] powerpc: Remove redundant fp/altivec giveup code Benjamin Herrenschmidt
@ 2017-08-16 6:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-08-16 6:01 ` [PATCH 5/5] powerpc: Remove more redundant VSX save/tests Benjamin Herrenschmidt
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2017-08-16 6:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev
__giveup_fpu() already does it and we cannot have MSR_VSX set
without having MSR_FP also set.
This also adds a warning to check we indeed do
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 14 +++++++++++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
index bfbd6083f841..fc285fab7118 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
@@ -331,11 +331,19 @@ static inline int restore_altivec(struct task_struct *tsk) { return 0; }
#ifdef CONFIG_VSX
static void __giveup_vsx(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
- if (tsk->thread.regs->msr & MSR_FP)
+ unsigned long msr = tsk->thread.regs->msr;
+
+ /*
+ * We should never be ssetting MSR_VSX without also setting
+ * MSR_FP and MSR_VEC
+ */
+ WARN_ON((msr & MSR_VSX) && !((msr & MSR_FP) && (msr & MSR_VEC)));
+
+ /* __giveup_fpu will clear MSR_VSX */
+ if (msr & MSR_FP)
__giveup_fpu(tsk);
- if (tsk->thread.regs->msr & MSR_VEC)
+ if (msr & MSR_VEC)
__giveup_altivec(tsk);
- tsk->thread.regs->msr &= ~MSR_VSX;
}
static void giveup_vsx(struct task_struct *tsk)
--
2.13.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5/5] powerpc: Remove more redundant VSX save/tests
2017-08-16 6:01 [PATCH 1/5] powerpc: Test MSR_FP and MSR_VEC when enabling/flushing VSX Benjamin Herrenschmidt
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2017-08-16 6:01 ` [PATCH 4/5] powerpc: Remove redundant clear of MSR_VSX in __giveup_vsx() Benjamin Herrenschmidt
@ 2017-08-16 6:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-08-16 6:02 ` [PATCH 1/5] powerpc: Test MSR_FP and MSR_VEC when enabling/flushing VSX Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-08-17 13:03 ` [1/5] " Michael Ellerman
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2017-08-16 6:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev
__giveup_vsx/save_vsx are completely equivalent to testing MSR_FP
and MSR_VEC and calling the corresponding giveup/save function so
just remove the spurious VSX cases. Also add WARN_ONs checking that
we never have VSX enabled without the two other.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 33 ++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
index fc285fab7118..7093b46b3603 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
@@ -355,14 +355,6 @@ static void giveup_vsx(struct task_struct *tsk)
msr_check_and_clear(MSR_FP|MSR_VEC|MSR_VSX);
}
-static void save_vsx(struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
- if (tsk->thread.regs->msr & MSR_FP)
- save_fpu(tsk);
- if (tsk->thread.regs->msr & MSR_VEC)
- save_altivec(tsk);
-}
-
void enable_kernel_vsx(void)
{
unsigned long cpumsr;
@@ -412,7 +404,6 @@ static int restore_vsx(struct task_struct *tsk)
}
#else
static inline int restore_vsx(struct task_struct *tsk) { return 0; }
-static inline void save_vsx(struct task_struct *tsk) { }
#endif /* CONFIG_VSX */
#ifdef CONFIG_SPE
@@ -492,6 +483,8 @@ void giveup_all(struct task_struct *tsk)
msr_check_and_set(msr_all_available);
check_if_tm_restore_required(tsk);
+ WARN_ON((usermsr & MSR_VSX) && !((usermsr & MSR_FP) && (usermsr & MSR_VEC)));
+
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_FPU
if (usermsr & MSR_FP)
__giveup_fpu(tsk);
@@ -500,10 +493,6 @@ void giveup_all(struct task_struct *tsk)
if (usermsr & MSR_VEC)
__giveup_altivec(tsk);
#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_VSX
- if (usermsr & MSR_VSX)
- __giveup_vsx(tsk);
-#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SPE
if (usermsr & MSR_SPE)
__giveup_spe(tsk);
@@ -562,19 +551,13 @@ void save_all(struct task_struct *tsk)
msr_check_and_set(msr_all_available);
- /*
- * Saving the way the register space is in hardware, save_vsx boils
- * down to a save_fpu() and save_altivec()
- */
- if (usermsr & MSR_VSX) {
- save_vsx(tsk);
- } else {
- if (usermsr & MSR_FP)
- save_fpu(tsk);
+ WARN_ON((usermsr & MSR_VSX) && !((usermsr & MSR_FP) && (usermsr & MSR_VEC)));
- if (usermsr & MSR_VEC)
- save_altivec(tsk);
- }
+ if (usermsr & MSR_FP)
+ save_fpu(tsk);
+
+ if (usermsr & MSR_VEC)
+ save_altivec(tsk);
if (usermsr & MSR_SPE)
__giveup_spe(tsk);
--
2.13.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/5] powerpc: Test MSR_FP and MSR_VEC when enabling/flushing VSX
2017-08-16 6:01 [PATCH 1/5] powerpc: Test MSR_FP and MSR_VEC when enabling/flushing VSX Benjamin Herrenschmidt
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2017-08-16 6:01 ` [PATCH 5/5] powerpc: Remove more redundant VSX save/tests Benjamin Herrenschmidt
@ 2017-08-16 6:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-08-17 13:03 ` [1/5] " Michael Ellerman
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2017-08-16 6:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev
On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 16:01 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> VSX uses a combination of the old vector registers, the old FP registers
> and new "second halves" of the FP registers.
>
> Thus when we need to see the VSX state in the thread struct
> (flush_vsx_to_thread) or when we'll use the VSX in the kernel
> (enable_kernel_vsx) we need to ensure they are all flushed into
> the thread struct if either of them is individually enabled.
>
> Unfortunately we only tested if the whole VSX was enabled, not
> if they were individually enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
And CC stable.
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> index 9f3e2c932dcc..883216b4296a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> @@ -362,7 +362,8 @@ void enable_kernel_vsx(void)
>
> cpumsr = msr_check_and_set(MSR_FP|MSR_VEC|MSR_VSX);
>
> - if (current->thread.regs && (current->thread.regs->msr & MSR_VSX)) {
> + if (current->thread.regs &&
> + (current->thread.regs->msr & (MSR_VSX|MSR_VEC|MSR_FP))) {
> check_if_tm_restore_required(current);
> /*
> * If a thread has already been reclaimed then the
> @@ -386,7 +387,7 @@ void flush_vsx_to_thread(struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> if (tsk->thread.regs) {
> preempt_disable();
> - if (tsk->thread.regs->msr & MSR_VSX) {
> + if (tsk->thread.regs->msr & (MSR_VSX|MSR_VEC|MSR_FP)) {
> BUG_ON(tsk != current);
> giveup_vsx(tsk);
> }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [1/5] powerpc: Test MSR_FP and MSR_VEC when enabling/flushing VSX
2017-08-16 6:01 [PATCH 1/5] powerpc: Test MSR_FP and MSR_VEC when enabling/flushing VSX Benjamin Herrenschmidt
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2017-08-16 6:02 ` [PATCH 1/5] powerpc: Test MSR_FP and MSR_VEC when enabling/flushing VSX Benjamin Herrenschmidt
@ 2017-08-17 13:03 ` Michael Ellerman
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2017-08-17 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, linuxppc-dev
On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 06:01:14 UTC, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> VSX uses a combination of the old vector registers, the old FP registers
> and new "second halves" of the FP registers.
>
> Thus when we need to see the VSX state in the thread struct
> (flush_vsx_to_thread) or when we'll use the VSX in the kernel
> (enable_kernel_vsx) we need to ensure they are all flushed into
> the thread struct if either of them is individually enabled.
>
> Unfortunately we only tested if the whole VSX was enabled, not
> if they were individually enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Applied to powerpc fixes, thanks.
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/5a69aec945d27e78abac9fd032533d
cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread