From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
dzickus@redhat.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linuxarm@huawei.com,
abdhalee@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, john.stultz@linaro.org
Subject: Re: RCU lockup issues when CONFIG_SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR=n - any one else seeing this?
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 14:14:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170820211429.GA27111@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170820183514.GM11320@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 11:35:14AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 11:00:40PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 14:45:53 +1000
> > Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 09:27:31 -0700
> > > "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 05:56:17AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thomas, John, am I misinterpreting the timer trace event messages?
> > >
> > > So I did some digging, and what you find is that rcu_sched seems to do a
> > > simple scheudle_timeout(1) and just goes out to lunch for many seconds.
> > > The process_timeout timer never fires (when it finally does wake after
> > > one of these events, it usually removes the timer with del_timer_sync).
> > >
> > > So this patch seems to fix it. Testing, comments welcome.
> >
> > Okay this had a problem of trying to forward the timer from a timer
> > callback function.
> >
> > This was my other approach which also fixes the RCU warnings, but it's
> > a little more complex. I reworked it a bit so the mod_timer fast path
> > hopefully doesn't have much more overhead (actually by reading jiffies
> > only when needed, it probably saves a load).
>
> Giving this one a whirl!
No joy here, but then again there are other reasons to believe that I
am seeing a different bug than Dave and Jonathan are.
OK, not -entirely- without joy -- 10 of 14 runs were error-free, which
is a good improvement over 0 of 84 for your earlier patch. ;-) But
not statistically different from what I see without either patch.
But no statistical difference compared to without patch, and I still
see the "rcu_sched kthread starved" messages. For whatever it is worth,
by the way, I also see this: "hrtimer: interrupt took 5712368 ns".
Hmmm... I am also seeing that without any of your patches. Might
be hypervisor preemption, I guess.
Thanx, Paul
PS. I will be off the grid for the next day or so. Eclipse day here...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-20 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20170725193039.00007c80@huawei.com>
2017-07-25 12:26 ` RCU lockup issues when CONFIG_SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR=n - any one else seeing this? Nicholas Piggin
2017-07-25 13:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-25 14:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-25 15:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-25 16:52 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-25 21:10 ` David Miller
2017-07-26 3:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-26 4:02 ` David Miller
2017-07-26 4:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-26 8:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-26 9:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-26 12:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-26 12:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-26 14:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-26 14:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-26 15:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-26 15:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-26 16:54 ` David Miller
2017-07-26 17:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-27 7:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-26 17:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-26 22:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-26 22:45 ` David Miller
2017-07-26 23:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-26 23:22 ` David Miller
2017-07-27 1:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-27 4:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-07-27 12:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-27 13:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-27 16:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-27 16:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-28 7:44 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-28 12:54 ` Boqun Feng
2017-07-28 13:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-28 14:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-28 18:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-28 19:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-30 13:37 ` Boqun Feng
2017-07-30 16:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-29 1:20 ` Boqun Feng
2017-07-28 18:42 ` David Miller
2017-07-28 13:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-28 13:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
[not found] ` <20170728165529.GF3730@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2017-07-28 17:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-28 19:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-31 11:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-31 15:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-31 15:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-08-01 18:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-02 16:25 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-08-15 15:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-16 1:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-08-16 12:43 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-16 12:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-16 15:31 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-16 16:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-17 13:55 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-20 4:45 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-20 5:01 ` David Miller
2017-08-20 5:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-20 13:00 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-20 18:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-20 21:14 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2017-08-21 0:52 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-21 6:06 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-21 10:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-08-21 14:19 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-21 15:02 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-08-21 20:55 ` David Miller
2017-08-22 7:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-08-22 8:51 ` Abdul Haleem
2017-08-22 15:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-09-06 12:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-22 0:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-31 11:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-31 11:55 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-08-01 10:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-26 16:48 ` David Miller
2017-07-26 3:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-26 7:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170820211429.GA27111@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=abdhalee@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).