From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/workqueue: update list of possible CPUs
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 06:26:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170823132642.GH491396@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lgmay2eg.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Hello, Michael.
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 09:00:39PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > I don't think that's true. The CPU id used in kernel doesn't have to
> > match the physical one and arch code should be able to pre-map CPU IDs
> > to nodes and use the matching one when hotplugging CPUs. I'm not
> > saying that's the best way to solve the problem tho.
>
> We already virtualise the CPU numbers, but not the node IDs. And it's
> the node IDs that are really the problem.
Yeah, it just needs to match up new cpus to the cpu ids assigned to
the right node.
> > It could be that the best way forward is making cpu <-> node mapping
> > dynamic and properly synchronized.
>
> We don't need it to be dynamic (at least for this bug).
The node mapping for that cpu id changes *dynamically* while the
system is running and that can race with node-affinity sensitive
operations such as memory allocations.
> Laurent is booting Qemu with a fixed CPU <-> Node mapping, it's just
> that because some CPUs aren't present at boot we don't know what the
> node mapping is. (Correct me if I'm wrong Laurent).
>
> So all we need is:
> - the workqueue code to cope with CPUs that are possible but not online
> having NUMA_NO_NODE to begin with.
> - a way to update the workqueue cpumask when the CPU comes online.
>
> Which seems reasonable to me?
Please take a step back and think through the problem again. You
can't bandaid it this way.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-23 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-21 13:49 [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/workqueue: update list of possible CPUs Laurent Vivier
2017-08-21 13:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] blk-mq: don't use WORK_CPU_UNBOUND Laurent Vivier
2017-08-21 14:48 ` Tejun Heo
2017-08-21 14:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/workqueue: update list of possible CPUs Tejun Heo
2017-08-22 1:41 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-22 16:54 ` Tejun Heo
2017-08-23 11:00 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-23 11:17 ` Laurent Vivier
2017-08-23 13:26 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2017-08-24 12:10 ` Laurent Vivier
2017-08-24 13:51 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170823132642.GH491396@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).