From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/powernv/idle: Round up latency and residency values
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 10:05:24 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170824043524.GA5695@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170823185841.25286-1-svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hi Vaidy,
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 12:28:41AM +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
wrote:
Cc'ing Rafael and linux-pm list.
> On PowerNV platforms, firmware provides exit latency and
> target residency for each of the idle states in nano
> seconds. Cpuidle framework expects the values in micro
> seconds. Round up to nearest micro seconds to avoid errors
> in cases where the values are defined as fractional micro
> seconds.
>
> Default idle state of 'snooze' has exit latency of zero. If
> other states have fractional micro second exit latency, they
> would get rounded down to zero micro second and make cpuidle
> framework choose deeper idle state when snooze loop is the
> right choice.
>
> Reported-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
> Signed-off-by: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c
> index 42896a67aeae..5f3922392059 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c
> @@ -383,9 +383,9 @@ static int powernv_add_idle_states(void)
> * Firmware passes residency and latency values in ns.
> * cpuidle expects it in us.
> */
> - exit_latency = latency_ns[i] / 1000;
> + exit_latency = DIV_ROUND_UP(latency_ns[i], 1000);
> if (!rc)
> - target_residency = residency_ns[i] / 1000;
> + target_residency = DIV_ROUND_UP(residency_ns[i], 1000);
> else
> target_residency = 0;
>
> --
> 2.13.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-24 4:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-23 18:58 [PATCH] powerpc/powernv/idle: Round up latency and residency values Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2017-08-24 4:35 ` Gautham R Shenoy [this message]
2017-08-24 10:28 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-24 13:07 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2017-11-14 11:12 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170824043524.GA5695@in.ibm.com \
--to=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).