From: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/powernv/idle: Round up latency and residency values
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:37:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170824130742.GA29369@drishya.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877extw98c.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
* Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> [2017-08-24 20:28:19]:
> Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>
> > On PowerNV platforms, firmware provides exit latency and
> > target residency for each of the idle states in nano
> > seconds. Cpuidle framework expects the values in micro
> > seconds. Round up to nearest micro seconds to avoid errors
> > in cases where the values are defined as fractional micro
> > seconds.
> >
> > Default idle state of 'snooze' has exit latency of zero. If
> > other states have fractional micro second exit latency, they
> > would get rounded down to zero micro second and make cpuidle
> > framework choose deeper idle state when snooze loop is the
> > right choice.
> >
> > Reported-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> This sounds like a fairly bad bug, does it need a Fixes / Cc stable tag?
Yes, we will need this on stable kernel that runs on POWER9. On older
platforms the latencies are larger and hence no impact :)
I will post to stable after this fix hits your -next tree.
--Vaidy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-24 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-23 18:58 [PATCH] powerpc/powernv/idle: Round up latency and residency values Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2017-08-24 4:35 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2017-08-24 10:28 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-24 13:07 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan [this message]
2017-11-14 11:12 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170824130742.GA29369@drishya.in.ibm.com \
--to=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).