Re: [RFC PATCH 8/8] powerpc/64s/radix: Only flush local TLB for spurious fault flushes

[Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>]

On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 08:05:38 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 00:51 +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > When permissiveness is relaxed, or found to have been relaxed by
> > another thread, we flush that address out of the TLB to avoid a
> > future fault or micro-fault due to a stale TLB entry.
> > 
> > Currently for processes with TLBs on other CPUs, this flush is always
> > done with a global tlbie. Although that could reduce faults on remote
> > CPUs, a broadcast operation seems to be wasteful for something that
> > can be handled in-core by the remote CPU if it comes to it.
> > 
> > This is not benchmarked yet. It does seem cut some tlbie operations
> > from the bus.  
> 
> What happens with the nest MMU here ?

Good question, I'm not sure. I can't tell from the UM or not if the
agent and NMMU must discard cached translations if there is a
translation cached but it has a permission fault. It's not clear 
from that I've read that if it's relying on the host to send back a
tlbie.

I'll keep digging.

Thanks,
Nick