From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3xtQHt17RCzDrN5 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 03:19:21 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v8EHJ26v126690 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:19:18 -0400 Received: from e17.ny.us.ibm.com (e17.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.207]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2cyuy0yafj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:19:18 -0400 Received: from localhost by e17.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:19:18 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 10:19:11 -0700 From: Ram Pai To: Balbir Singh Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, hbabu@us.ibm.com, mhocko@kernel.org, bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ebiederm@xmission.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] powerpc: capture the PTE format changes in the dump pte report Reply-To: Ram Pai References: <1504910713-7094-1-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> <1504910713-7094-8-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> <20170914132227.204ae9ac@firefly.ozlabs.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20170914132227.204ae9ac@firefly.ozlabs.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20170914171911.GD5698@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 01:22:27PM +1000, Balbir Singh wrote: > On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 15:44:47 -0700 > Ram Pai wrote: > > > The H_PAGE_F_SECOND,H_PAGE_F_GIX are not in the 64K main-PTE. > > capture these changes in the dump pte report. > > > > Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V > > Signed-off-by: Ram Pai > > --- > > So we lose slot and secondary information for 64K PTE's with > this change? yes. It was anyway not there for 4k-backed-64k ptes. Now it wont be there for any 64k ptes. RP