From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Roy Pledge <roy.pledge@nxp.com>
Cc: "mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
Madalin-cristian Bucur <madalin.bucur@nxp.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
"oss@buserror.net" <oss@buserror.net>,
"linux@armlinux.org.uk" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [v4 07/11] soc/fsl/qbman: Rework portal mapping calls for ARM/PPC
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 14:49:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170915214902.5argyl7d7bz4wykf@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DB6PR04MB29990A7A076761DDACCC1904866F0@DB6PR04MB2999.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 07:07:50PM +0000, Roy Pledge wrote:
> On 9/14/2017 10:00 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 04:37:51PM -0400, Roy Pledge wrote:
> >> @@ -123,23 +122,34 @@ static int bman_portal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> }
> >> pcfg->irq = irq;
> >>
> >> - va = ioremap_prot(addr_phys[0]->start, resource_size(addr_phys[0]), 0);
> >> - if (!va) {
> >> - dev_err(dev, "ioremap::CE failed\n");
> >> + /*
> >> + * TODO: Ultimately we would like to use a cacheable/non-shareable
> >> + * (coherent) mapping for the portal on both architectures but that
> >> + * isn't currently available in the kernel. Because of HW differences
> >> + * PPC needs to be mapped cacheable while ARM SoCs will work with non
> >> + * cacheable mappings
> >> + */
> >
> > This comment mentions "cacheable/non-shareable (coherent)". Was this
> > meant for ARM platforms? Because non-shareable is not coherent, nor is
> > this combination guaranteed to work with different CPUs and
> > interconnects.
>
> My wording is poor I should have been clearer that non-shareable ==
> non-coherent. I will fix this.
>
> We do understand that cacheable/non shareable isn't supported on all
> CPU/interconnect combinations but we have verified with ARM that for the
> CPU/interconnects we have integrated QBMan on our use is OK. The note is
> here to try to explain why the mapping is different right now. Once we
> get the basic QBMan support integrated for ARM we do plan to try to have
> patches integrated that enable the cacheable mapping as it gives a
> significant performance boost.
I will definitely not ack those patches (at least not in the form I've
seen, assuming certain eviction order of the bytes in a cacheline). The
reason is that it is incredibly fragile, highly dependent on the CPU
microarchitecture and interconnects. Assuming that you ever only have a
single SoC with this device, you may get away with #ifdefs in the
driver. But if you support two or more SoCs with different behaviours,
you'd have to make run-time decisions in the driver or run-time code
patching. We are very keen on single kernel binary image/drivers and
architecturally compliant code (the cacheable mapping hacks are well
outside the architecture behaviour).
> >> diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/dpaa_sys.h b/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/dpaa_sys.h
> >> index 81a9a5e..0a1d573 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/dpaa_sys.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/dpaa_sys.h
> >> @@ -51,12 +51,12 @@
> >>
> >> static inline void dpaa_flush(void *p)
> >> {
> >> + /*
> >> + * Only PPC needs to flush the cache currently - on ARM the mapping
> >> + * is non cacheable
> >> + */
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC
> >> flush_dcache_range((unsigned long)p, (unsigned long)p+64);
> >> -#elif defined(CONFIG_ARM)
> >> - __cpuc_flush_dcache_area(p, 64);
> >> -#elif defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
> >> - __flush_dcache_area(p, 64);
> >> #endif
> >> }
> >
> > Dropping the private API cache maintenance is fine and the memory is WC
> > now for ARM (mapping to Normal NonCacheable). However, do you require
> > any barriers here? Normal NC doesn't guarantee any ordering.
>
> The barrier is done in the code where the command is formed. We follow
> this pattern
> a) Zero the command cache line (the device never reacts to a 0 command
> verb so a cast out of this will have no effect)
> b) Fill in everything in the command except the command verb (byte 0)
> c) Execute a memory barrier
> d) Set the command verb (byte 0)
> e) Flush the command
> If a castout happens between d) and e) doesn't matter since it was about
> to be flushed anyway . Any castout before d) will not cause HW to
> process the command because verb is still 0. The barrier at c) prevents
> reordering so the HW cannot see the verb set before the command is formed.
I think that's fine, the dpaa_flush() can be a no-op with non-cacheable
memory (I had forgotten the details).
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-15 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-24 20:37 [v4 00/11] soc/fsl/qbman: Enable QBMan on ARM Platforms Roy Pledge
2017-08-24 20:37 ` [v4 01/11] soc/fsl/qbman: Use shared-dma-pool for BMan private memory allocations Roy Pledge
2017-09-14 13:46 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-08-24 20:37 ` [v4 02/11] soc/fsl/qbman: Use shared-dma-pool for QMan " Roy Pledge
2017-08-24 20:37 ` [v4 03/11] dt-bindings: soc/fsl: Update reserved memory binding for QBMan Roy Pledge
2017-09-14 13:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-08-24 20:37 ` [v4 04/11] soc/fsl/qbman: Drop set/clear_bits usage Roy Pledge
2017-08-24 20:37 ` [v4 05/11] soc/fsl/qbman: Drop L1_CACHE_BYTES compile time check Roy Pledge
2017-09-14 13:49 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-14 18:30 ` Roy Pledge
2017-08-24 20:37 ` [v4 06/11] soc/fsl/qbman: Fix ARM32 typo Roy Pledge
2017-08-24 20:37 ` [v4 07/11] soc/fsl/qbman: Rework portal mapping calls for ARM/PPC Roy Pledge
2017-09-14 14:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-14 19:07 ` Roy Pledge
2017-09-15 21:49 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2017-09-18 18:48 ` Roy Pledge
2017-08-24 20:37 ` [v4 08/11] soc/fsl/qbman: add QMAN_REV32 Roy Pledge
2017-08-24 20:37 ` [v4 09/11] soc/fsl/qbman: different register offsets on ARM Roy Pledge
2017-08-24 20:37 ` [v4 10/11] soc/fsl/qbman: Add missing headers " Roy Pledge
2017-08-24 20:37 ` [v4 11/11] fsl/soc/qbman: Enable FSL_LAYERSCAPE config " Roy Pledge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170915214902.5argyl7d7bz4wykf@localhost \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=leoyang.li@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=madalin.bucur@nxp.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=oss@buserror.net \
--cc=roy.pledge@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).