linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	x86@kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
	borntraeger@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, willy@infradead.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
	ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, sam@ravnborg.org,
	mgorman@techsingularity.net, Steven.Sistare@oracle.com,
	daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com, bob.picco@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/11] arm64/kasan: explicitly zero kasan shadow memory
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 22:51:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170915215147.GA11849@remoulade> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bff836ec-3922-1783-6cb4-94d1be92544b@oracle.com>

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 05:20:59PM -0400, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> 
> I had this option  back upto version 3, where zero flag was passed into
> vmemmap_alloc_block(), but I was asked to remove it, because it required too
> many changes in other places.

Ok. Sorry for bringing back a point that had already been covered.

> So, the current approach is cleaner, but the idea is that kasan should use
> its own version of vmemmap_populate() for both x86 and ARM, but I think it is
> outside of the scope of this work.

I appreciate that this is unrelated to your ultimate goal, and that this is
somewhat frustrating given the KASAN code is arguably abusing the
vmemmap_populate() interface.

However, I do think we need to migrate the KASAN code to a proper interface
immediately, rather than making it worse in the interim.

> If you think I should add these function in this project, than sure I can
> send a new version with kasanmap_populate() functions.

I would very much appreciate if you could send a version with a
kasan_map_populate() interface. I'm more than happy to review/test that portion
of the series, or to help if there's some problem which makes that difficult.

Thanks,
Mark.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-15 22:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-14 22:35 [PATCH v7 00/11] complete deferred page initialization Pavel Tatashin
2017-09-14 22:35 ` [PATCH v8 01/11] x86/mm: setting fields in deferred pages Pavel Tatashin
2017-09-14 22:35 ` [PATCH v8 02/11] sparc64/mm: " Pavel Tatashin
2017-09-14 22:35 ` [PATCH v8 03/11] mm: deferred_init_memmap improvements Pavel Tatashin
2017-09-14 22:35 ` [PATCH v8 04/11] sparc64: simplify vmemmap_populate Pavel Tatashin
2017-09-14 22:35 ` [PATCH v8 05/11] mm: defining memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_raw Pavel Tatashin
2017-09-14 22:35 ` [PATCH v8 06/11] mm: zero struct pages during initialization Pavel Tatashin
2017-09-14 22:35 ` [PATCH v8 07/11] sparc64: optimized struct page zeroing Pavel Tatashin
2017-09-14 22:35 ` [PATCH v8 08/11] mm: zero reserved and unavailable struct pages Pavel Tatashin
2017-09-14 22:35 ` [PATCH v8 09/11] x86/kasan: explicitly zero kasan shadow memory Pavel Tatashin
2017-09-14 22:35 ` [PATCH v8 10/11] arm64/kasan: " Pavel Tatashin
2017-09-15  1:10   ` Mark Rutland
2017-09-15  1:30     ` Pavel Tatashin
2017-09-15 20:38       ` Mark Rutland
2017-09-15 21:20         ` Pavel Tatashin
2017-09-15 21:51           ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2017-09-14 22:35 ` [PATCH v8 11/11] mm: stop zeroing memory during allocation in vmemmap Pavel Tatashin
2017-09-14 22:40 ` [PATCH v8 00/11] complete deferred page initialization Pavel Tatashin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170915215147.GA11849@remoulade \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=Steven.Sistare@oracle.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=bob.picco@oracle.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).