From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] powerpc64: Add .opd based function descriptor dereference
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 19:31:54 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170919103154.GC401@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87shfjkmxe.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
On (09/19/17 20:22), Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On 2017/09/16 12:53PM, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> >> We are moving towards separate kernel and module function descriptor
> >> dereference callbacks. This patch enables it for powerpc64.
> >>
> >> For pointers that belong to the kernel
> >> - Added __start_opd and __end_opd pointers, to track the kernel
> >> .opd section address range;
> >>
> >> - Added dereference_kernel_function_descriptor(). Now we
> >> will dereference only function pointers that are within
> >> [__start_opd, __end_opd];
> >>
> >> For pointers that belong to a module
> >> - Added dereference_module_function_descriptor() to handle module
> >> function descriptor dereference. Now we will dereference only
> >> pointers that are within [module->opd.start, module->opd.end].
> >
> > Would it be simpler to just use kernel_text_address() and dereference
> > everything else? See commit 83e840c770f2c5 ("powerpc64/elfv1: Only
> > dereference function descriptor for non-text symbols") for a related
> > patch.
>
> Yeah that would be a lot simpler and probably work perfectly well.
unlike ppc_function_entry(), printk() can get called on any symbol,
not just function pointers.
for example,
cat /proc/kallsyms | grep shrinker_rwsem
ffffffff81a4b1e0 d shrinker_rwsem
or
cat /proc/kallsyms | grep vm_total_pages
ffffffff81dcd418 B vm_total_pages
and so on.
-ss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-19 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-16 3:53 [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-16 3:53 ` [PATCH 1/5] sections: split dereference_function_descriptor() Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-16 3:53 ` [PATCH 2/5] ia64: Add .opd based function descriptor dereference Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-16 3:53 ` [PATCH 3/5] powerpc64: " Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-16 9:43 ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-09-16 11:25 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-19 10:22 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-09-19 10:31 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2017-09-20 1:51 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-09-20 6:10 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-16 3:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] parisc64: " Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-16 3:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] symbol lookup: use new kernel and module dereference functions Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-18 17:44 ` [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers Luck, Tony
2017-09-18 18:39 ` Helge Deller
2017-09-19 2:05 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-19 13:38 ` David Laight
2017-09-19 20:07 ` Helge Deller
2017-09-20 8:41 ` David Laight
2017-09-20 10:20 ` Helge Deller
2017-09-20 16:31 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-19 14:07 ` Helge Deller
2017-09-19 20:03 ` Helge Deller
2017-09-20 0:47 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-19 2:08 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170919103154.GC401@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).