From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-pf0-x241.google.com (mail-pf0-x241.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::241])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3y0w8s6GvgzDr4N
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 17:05:49 +1000 (AEST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x241.google.com with SMTP id a7so3256402pfj.5
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 00:05:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:05:42 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
 Santosh Sivaraj <santosh@fossix.org>,
 Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
 "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
 Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
 James Bottomley <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
 Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
 Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
 "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
 "linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
 "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
 "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate
 %pF/%pf printk specifiers
Message-ID: <20170925070542.GA387@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
References: <20170920162910.32053-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
 <20170922053404.3zpfpwetabjut2er@santosiv.in.ibm.com>
 <20170922080023.GA599@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
 <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F61381992@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F61381992@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On (09/22/17 16:48), Luck, Tony wrote:
[..]
> Tested patch series on ia64 successfully.
> 
> Tested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>

thanks!

> After this goes upstream, you should submit a patch to get rid of
> all uses of %pF (70 instances in 35 files) and %pf (63 in 34)
> 
> Perhaps break the patch by top-level directory (e.g. get all the %pF
> and %pF in the 17 files under drivers/ in one patch).

frankly, I was going to have some sort of a lazy deprecation process:
didn't plan to send out a patch set that would hunt down all pf/pF-s.
hm...


speaking of upstream, any objections if this patch set will go through
the printk tree, in one piece?

I'll wait for several more days and then resend v3 with updated
Documentation and tweaked checkpatch warning message.

	-ss