linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
To: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
	paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	hbabu@us.ibm.com, bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mhocko@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v7 02/25] powerpc: track allocation status of all pkeys
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 13:42:49 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171018134249.0e7a248d@firefly.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1501459946-11619-3-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com>

On Sun, 30 Jul 2017 17:12:03 -0700
Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Total 32 keys are available on power7 and above. However
> pkey 0,1 are reserved. So effectively we  have  30 pkeys.
> 
> On 4K kernels, we do not  have  5  bits  in  the  PTE to
> represent  all the keys; we only have 3bits.Two of those
> keys are reserved; pkey 0 and pkey 1. So effectively  we
> have 6 pkeys.
> 
> This patch keeps track of reserved keys, allocated  keys
> and keys that are currently free.
> 
> Also it  adds  skeletal  functions  and macros, that the
> architecture-independent code expects to be available.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu.h |    9 +++
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h   |    1 +
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h         |   98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_book3s64.c   |    2 +
>  arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c                  |    2 +
>  5 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu.h
> index 77529a3..104ad72 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu.h
> @@ -108,6 +108,15 @@ struct patb_entry {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU
>  	struct list_head iommu_group_mem_list;
>  #endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
> +	/*
> +	 * Each bit represents one protection key.
> +	 * bit set   -> key allocated
> +	 * bit unset -> key available for allocation
> +	 */
> +	u32 pkey_allocation_map;
> +#endif
>  } mm_context_t;
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> index 4b93547..4705dab 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> @@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ static inline bool arch_vma_access_permitted(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  
>  #ifndef CONFIG_PPC64_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
>  #define pkey_initialize()
> +#define pkey_mm_init(mm)
>  #endif /* CONFIG_PPC64_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS */
>  
>  #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
> index 4ccb8f5..def385f 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
> @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
>  #define _ASM_PPC64_PKEYS_H
>  
>  extern bool pkey_inited;
> +extern int pkeys_total; /* total pkeys as per device tree */
> +extern u32 initial_allocation_mask;/* bits set for reserved keys */
>  
>  /*
>   * powerpc needs an additional vma bit to support 32 keys.
> @@ -20,21 +22,76 @@
>  #define VM_PKEY_BIT4	VM_HIGH_ARCH_4
>  #endif
>  
> -#define ARCH_VM_PKEY_FLAGS 0
> +#define arch_max_pkey()  pkeys_total
> +#define ARCH_VM_PKEY_FLAGS (VM_PKEY_BIT0 | VM_PKEY_BIT1 | VM_PKEY_BIT2 | \
> +				VM_PKEY_BIT3 | VM_PKEY_BIT4)
> +
> +#define pkey_alloc_mask(pkey) (0x1 << pkey)
> +
> +#define mm_pkey_allocation_map(mm)	(mm->context.pkey_allocation_map)
> +
> +#define mm_set_pkey_allocated(mm, pkey) {	\
> +	mm_pkey_allocation_map(mm) |= pkey_alloc_mask(pkey); \
> +}
> +
> +#define mm_set_pkey_free(mm, pkey) {	\
> +	mm_pkey_allocation_map(mm) &= ~pkey_alloc_mask(pkey);	\
> +}
> +
> +#define mm_set_pkey_is_allocated(mm, pkey)	\
> +	(mm_pkey_allocation_map(mm) & pkey_alloc_mask(pkey))
> +
> +#define mm_set_pkey_is_reserved(mm, pkey) (initial_allocation_mask & \
> +					pkey_alloc_mask(pkey))
>  
>  static inline bool mm_pkey_is_allocated(struct mm_struct *mm, int pkey)
>  {
> -	return (pkey == 0);
> +	/* a reserved key is never considered as 'explicitly allocated' */
> +	return ((pkey < arch_max_pkey()) &&
> +		!mm_set_pkey_is_reserved(mm, pkey) &&
> +		mm_set_pkey_is_allocated(mm, pkey));

Sounds like this should be called mm_pkey_is_free()

>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Returns a positive, 5-bit key on success, or -1 on failure.
> + */
>  static inline int mm_pkey_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
> -	return -1;
> +	/*
> +	 * Note: this is the one and only place we make sure
> +	 * that the pkey is valid as far as the hardware is
> +	 * concerned.  The rest of the kernel trusts that
> +	 * only good, valid pkeys come out of here.
> +	 */
> +	u32 all_pkeys_mask = (u32)(~(0x0));
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!pkey_inited)
> +		return -1;
> +	/*
> +	 * Are we out of pkeys?  We must handle this specially
> +	 * because ffz() behavior is undefined if there are no
> +	 * zeros.
> +	 */
Point A

> +	if (mm_pkey_allocation_map(mm) == all_pkeys_mask)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	ret = ffz((u32)mm_pkey_allocation_map(mm));

Point B

So the allocation occurs from MSB to LSB?  I also think you need
a preempt disable between points A, B.

Is this code reentrant?

> +	mm_set_pkey_allocated(mm, ret);
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static inline int mm_pkey_free(struct mm_struct *mm, int pkey)
>  {
> -	return -EINVAL;
> +	if (!pkey_inited)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	if (!mm_pkey_is_allocated(mm, pkey))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	mm_set_pkey_free(mm, pkey);
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -58,12 +115,45 @@ static inline int arch_set_user_pkey_access(struct task_struct *tsk, int pkey,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static inline void pkey_mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm)
> +{
> +	if (!pkey_inited)
> +		return;
> +	mm_pkey_allocation_map(mm) = initial_allocation_mask;
> +}
> +
>  static inline void pkey_initialize(void)
>  {
> +	int os_reserved, i;
> +
>  	/* disable the pkey system till everything
>  	 * is in place. A patch further down the
>  	 * line will enable it.
>  	 */
>  	pkey_inited = false;

Why are we doing it this way?

> +
> +	/* Lets assume 32 keys */
> +	pkeys_total = 32;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_4K_PAGES
> +	/*
> +	 * the OS can manage only 8 pkeys
> +	 * due to its inability to represent
> +	 * them in the linux 4K-PTE.
> +	 */
> +	os_reserved = pkeys_total-8;
> +#else
> +	os_reserved = 0;
> +#endif
> +	/*
> +	 * Bits are in LE format.
> +	 * NOTE: 1, 0 are reserved.
> +	 * key 0 is the default key, which allows read/write/execute.
> +	 * key 1 is recommended not to be used.
> +	 * PowerISA(3.0) page 1015, programming note.
> +	 */
> +	initial_allocation_mask = ~0x0;
> +	for (i = 2; i < (pkeys_total - os_reserved); i++)
> +		initial_allocation_mask &= ~(0x1<<i);

On radix key 0 is used for supervisor mode to implement SMEP
and SMAP. It would be nice to reserve key 0 for the OS for
hash as well. Why are the bits in LE format? The limitations
of the adjunct partition apply to Linux?

>  }
>  #endif /*_ASM_PPC64_PKEYS_H */
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_book3s64.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_book3s64.c
> index a3edf81..34a16f3 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_book3s64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_book3s64.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>  #include <linux/string.h>
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  #include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/pkeys.h>
>  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>  #include <linux/idr.h>
>  #include <linux/export.h>
> @@ -120,6 +121,7 @@ static int hash__init_new_context(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  
>  	subpage_prot_init_new_context(mm);
>  
> +	pkey_mm_init(mm);
>  	return index;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
> index c3acee1..37dacc5 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
> @@ -16,3 +16,5 @@
>  #include <linux/pkeys.h>                /* PKEY_*                       */
>  
>  bool pkey_inited;
> +int  pkeys_total;		/* total pkeys as per device tree */
> +u32  initial_allocation_mask;	/* bits set for reserved keys */

Balbir

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-18  2:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-31  0:12 [RFC v7 00/25] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Ram Pai
2017-07-31  0:12 ` [RFC v7 01/25] powerpc: define an additional vma bit for protection keys Ram Pai
2017-07-31  0:12 ` [RFC v7 02/25] powerpc: track allocation status of all pkeys Ram Pai
2017-08-10 20:25   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-08-11  5:39     ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-17 16:00       ` Ram Pai
2017-08-17 15:48     ` Ram Pai
2017-08-17 20:40       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  2:42   ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2017-10-18  3:40     ` Ram Pai
2017-10-18 16:08   ` Laurent Dufour
2017-10-18 22:04     ` Ram Pai
2017-07-31  0:12 ` [RFC v7 03/25] powerpc: helper function to read, write AMR, IAMR, UAMOR registers Ram Pai
2017-07-31  0:12 ` [RFC v7 04/25] powerpc: helper functions to initialize AMR, IAMR and " Ram Pai
2017-07-31  0:12 ` [RFC v7 05/25] powerpc: cleaup AMR, iAMR when a key is allocated or freed Ram Pai
2017-07-31  0:12 ` [RFC v7 06/25] powerpc: implementation for arch_set_user_pkey_access() Ram Pai
2017-07-31  0:12 ` [RFC v7 07/25] powerpc: sys_pkey_alloc() and sys_pkey_free() system calls Ram Pai
2017-07-31  0:12 ` [RFC v7 08/25] powerpc: ability to create execute-disabled pkeys Ram Pai
2017-07-31  0:12 ` [RFC v7 09/25] powerpc: store and restore the pkey state across context switches Ram Pai
2017-08-10 20:46   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-08-11  6:34     ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-17 16:41       ` Ram Pai
2017-07-31  0:12 ` [RFC v7 10/25] powerpc: introduce execute-only pkey Ram Pai
2017-07-31  0:12 ` [RFC v7 11/25] powerpc: ability to associate pkey to a vma Ram Pai
2017-07-31  0:12 ` [RFC v7 12/25] powerpc: implementation for arch_override_mprotect_pkey() Ram Pai
2017-10-18 15:58   ` Laurent Dufour
2017-10-18 21:37     ` Ram Pai
2017-07-31  0:12 ` [RFC v7 13/25] powerpc: map vma key-protection bits to pte key bits Ram Pai
2017-07-31  0:12 ` [RFC v7 14/25] powerpc: sys_pkey_mprotect() system call Ram Pai
2017-07-31  0:12 ` [RFC v7 15/25] powerpc: Program HPTE key protection bits Ram Pai
2017-10-18 16:15   ` Laurent Dufour
2017-10-18 22:12     ` Ram Pai
2017-10-19  5:12       ` Michael Ellerman
2017-07-31  0:12 ` [RFC v7 16/25] powerpc: helper to validate key-access permissions of a pte Ram Pai
2017-10-18 16:08   ` Laurent Dufour
2017-10-18 21:56     ` Ram Pai
2017-10-19  5:13       ` Michael Ellerman
2017-07-31  0:12 ` [RFC v7 17/25] powerpc: check key protection for user page access Ram Pai
2017-07-31  0:12 ` [RFC v7 18/25] powerpc: Macro the mask used for checking DSI exception Ram Pai
2017-07-31  0:12 ` [RFC v7 19/25] powerpc: implementation for arch_vma_access_permitted() Ram Pai
2017-07-31  0:12 ` [RFC v7 20/25] powerpc: Handle exceptions caused by pkey violation Ram Pai
2017-07-31  0:12 ` [RFC v7 21/25] powerpc: capture AMR register content on " Ram Pai
2017-07-31  0:12 ` [RFC v7 22/25] powerpc: introduce get_pte_pkey() helper Ram Pai
2017-07-31  0:12 ` [RFC v7 23/25] powerpc: capture the violated protection key on fault Ram Pai
2017-07-31  0:12 ` [RFC v7 24/25] powerpc: Deliver SEGV signal on pkey violation Ram Pai
2017-08-10 21:00   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-08-11 10:26     ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-17 17:14       ` Ram Pai
2017-08-18  4:48         ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-18 17:04           ` Ram Pai
2017-08-18 21:54             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-08-18 22:36               ` Ram Pai
2017-10-18  2:25                 ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-18  3:01                   ` Ram Pai
2017-08-18 22:49             ` Ram Pai
2017-08-19  8:23               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-07-31  0:12 ` [RFC v7 25/25] powerpc: Enable pkey subsystem Ram Pai
2017-08-10 21:27   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-08-17 17:40     ` Ram Pai
2017-08-17 20:30       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-08-17 23:48         ` Ram Pai
2017-08-18  5:07           ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-18 15:26             ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-08-18 16:32               ` Ram Pai
2017-08-11 17:34 ` [RFC v7 26/25] mm/mprotect, powerpc/mm/pkeys, x86/mm/pkeys: Add sysfs interface Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-08-18  0:25   ` Ram Pai
2017-08-18 23:19     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171018134249.0e7a248d@firefly.ozlabs.ibm.com \
    --to=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).