linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC PATCH kernel] powerpc/pci: Get rid of unused @parent pointer in pci_controller
@ 2017-11-06  3:24 Alexey Kardashevskiy
  2017-11-06  3:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Kardashevskiy @ 2017-11-06  3:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linuxppc-dev
  Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy, Andrew Donnellan, Benjamin Herrenschmidt,
	Frederic Barrat, Michael Ellerman, Paul Mackerras,
	Michael Neuling

The @parent pointer is supposed to point to a device which represents
a PCI controller, however it is never set to anything and remains NULL;
it is also quite common to pass NULL to pci_create_root_bus().

Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
---

This @parent is NULL for every PHB in garrison machines, for example.
Where would this pointer be really used?

I wonder how does setting it make any difference in sysfs for CXL vphb?

In general, I'd think that @parent makes sense and every PHB
has a parent device struct like any other device and the platform
code binds a correct device driver to a PHB and we can avoid
having PNV_PHB_IODA2&co switches but for some reason PHBs are
hardcoded in the platform code.

---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h | 1 -
 arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c      | 2 +-
 drivers/misc/cxl/vphb.c               | 3 ---
 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
index 752718a2949d..ad88ddeaa6b7 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
@@ -60,7 +60,6 @@ struct pci_controller {
 #endif
 	struct device_node *dn;
 	struct list_head list_node;
-	struct device *parent;
 
 	int first_busno;
 	int last_busno;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
index 02831a396419..597576777c34 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
@@ -1681,7 +1681,7 @@ void pcibios_scan_phb(struct pci_controller *hose)
 	pci_add_resource(&resources, &hose->busn);
 
 	/* Create an empty bus for the toplevel */
-	bus = pci_create_root_bus(hose->parent, hose->first_busno,
+	bus = pci_create_root_bus(NULL, hose->first_busno,
 				  hose->ops, hose, &resources);
 	if (bus == NULL) {
 		pr_err("Failed to create bus for PCI domain %04x\n",
diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/vphb.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/vphb.c
index 512a4897dbf6..ae3fe1563812 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/cxl/vphb.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/vphb.c
@@ -232,9 +232,6 @@ int cxl_pci_vphb_add(struct cxl_afu *afu)
 	if (!phb)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	/* Setup parent in sysfs */
-	phb->parent = parent;
-
 	/* Setup the PHB using arch provided callback */
 	phb->ops = &cxl_pcie_pci_ops;
 	phb->cfg_addr = NULL;
-- 
2.11.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC PATCH kernel] powerpc/pci: Get rid of unused @parent pointer in pci_controller
  2017-11-06  3:24 [RFC PATCH kernel] powerpc/pci: Get rid of unused @parent pointer in pci_controller Alexey Kardashevskiy
@ 2017-11-06  3:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
  2017-11-06  3:53   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2017-11-06  3:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexey Kardashevskiy, linuxppc-dev
  Cc: Andrew Donnellan, Frederic Barrat, Michael Ellerman,
	Paul Mackerras, Michael Neuling

On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 14:24 +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> The @parent pointer is supposed to point to a device which represents
> a PCI controller, however it is never set to anything and remains NULL;
> it is also quite common to pass NULL to pci_create_root_bus().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
> ---

It's used for anything using of_pci_phb_probe() such as Cell.


> 
> This @parent is NULL for every PHB in garrison machines, for example.
> Where would this pointer be really used?
> 
> I wonder how does setting it make any difference in sysfs for CXL vphb?
> 
> In general, I'd think that @parent makes sense and every PHB
> has a parent device struct like any other device and the platform
> code binds a correct device driver to a PHB and we can avoid
> having PNV_PHB_IODA2&co switches but for some reason PHBs are
> hardcoded in the platform code.
> 
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h | 1 -
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c      | 2 +-
>  drivers/misc/cxl/vphb.c               | 3 ---
>  3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
> index 752718a2949d..ad88ddeaa6b7 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
> @@ -60,7 +60,6 @@ struct pci_controller {
>  #endif
>  	struct device_node *dn;
>  	struct list_head list_node;
> -	struct device *parent;
>  
>  	int first_busno;
>  	int last_busno;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> index 02831a396419..597576777c34 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> @@ -1681,7 +1681,7 @@ void pcibios_scan_phb(struct pci_controller *hose)
>  	pci_add_resource(&resources, &hose->busn);
>  
>  	/* Create an empty bus for the toplevel */
> -	bus = pci_create_root_bus(hose->parent, hose->first_busno,
> +	bus = pci_create_root_bus(NULL, hose->first_busno,
>  				  hose->ops, hose, &resources);
>  	if (bus == NULL) {
>  		pr_err("Failed to create bus for PCI domain %04x\n",
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/vphb.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/vphb.c
> index 512a4897dbf6..ae3fe1563812 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/cxl/vphb.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/vphb.c
> @@ -232,9 +232,6 @@ int cxl_pci_vphb_add(struct cxl_afu *afu)
>  	if (!phb)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> -	/* Setup parent in sysfs */
> -	phb->parent = parent;
> -
>  	/* Setup the PHB using arch provided callback */
>  	phb->ops = &cxl_pcie_pci_ops;
>  	phb->cfg_addr = NULL;

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC PATCH kernel] powerpc/pci: Get rid of unused @parent pointer in pci_controller
  2017-11-06  3:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
@ 2017-11-06  3:53   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Kardashevskiy @ 2017-11-06  3:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, linuxppc-dev
  Cc: Andrew Donnellan, Frederic Barrat, Michael Ellerman,
	Paul Mackerras, Michael Neuling

On 06/11/17 14:33, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 14:24 +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> The @parent pointer is supposed to point to a device which represents
>> a PCI controller, however it is never set to anything and remains NULL;
>> it is also quite common to pass NULL to pci_create_root_bus().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
>> ---
> 
> It's used for anything using of_pci_phb_probe() such as Cell.


ah, ok, thanks.

> 
> 
>>
>> This @parent is NULL for every PHB in garrison machines, for example.
>> Where would this pointer be really used?
>>
>> I wonder how does setting it make any difference in sysfs for CXL vphb?
>>
>> In general, I'd think that @parent makes sense and every PHB
>> has a parent device struct like any other device and the platform
>> code binds a correct device driver to a PHB and we can avoid
>> having PNV_PHB_IODA2&co switches but for some reason PHBs are
>> hardcoded in the platform code.
>>
>> ---
>>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h | 1 -
>>  arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c      | 2 +-
>>  drivers/misc/cxl/vphb.c               | 3 ---
>>  3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
>> index 752718a2949d..ad88ddeaa6b7 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
>> @@ -60,7 +60,6 @@ struct pci_controller {
>>  #endif
>>  	struct device_node *dn;
>>  	struct list_head list_node;
>> -	struct device *parent;
>>  
>>  	int first_busno;
>>  	int last_busno;
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>> index 02831a396419..597576777c34 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>> @@ -1681,7 +1681,7 @@ void pcibios_scan_phb(struct pci_controller *hose)
>>  	pci_add_resource(&resources, &hose->busn);
>>  
>>  	/* Create an empty bus for the toplevel */
>> -	bus = pci_create_root_bus(hose->parent, hose->first_busno,
>> +	bus = pci_create_root_bus(NULL, hose->first_busno,
>>  				  hose->ops, hose, &resources);
>>  	if (bus == NULL) {
>>  		pr_err("Failed to create bus for PCI domain %04x\n",
>> diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/vphb.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/vphb.c
>> index 512a4897dbf6..ae3fe1563812 100644
>> --- a/drivers/misc/cxl/vphb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/vphb.c
>> @@ -232,9 +232,6 @@ int cxl_pci_vphb_add(struct cxl_afu *afu)
>>  	if (!phb)
>>  		return -ENODEV;
>>  
>> -	/* Setup parent in sysfs */
>> -	phb->parent = parent;
>> -
>>  	/* Setup the PHB using arch provided callback */
>>  	phb->ops = &cxl_pcie_pci_ops;
>>  	phb->cfg_addr = NULL;


-- 
Alexey

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-11-06  3:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-11-06  3:24 [RFC PATCH kernel] powerpc/pci: Get rid of unused @parent pointer in pci_controller Alexey Kardashevskiy
2017-11-06  3:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-11-06  3:53   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).